19 Cited authorities

  1. Thompson v. City of Chicago

    472 F.3d 444 (7th Cir. 2006)   Cited 360 times
    Holding that Chicago Police Department's General Order pertaining to the use of force "shed[] no light on what may or may not be considered 'objectively reasonable' under the Fourth Amendment"
  2. Ervin v. Johnson

    492 F.3d 901 (7th Cir. 2007)   Cited 274 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a physician's opinion, without the support of epidemiological data or any physiological explanation was unreliable
  3. Good Shepherd Manor Found. v. City of Momence

    323 F.3d 557 (7th Cir. 2003)   Cited 244 times
    Holding that "reasonable accommodation is a theory of liability separate from intentional discrimination"
  4. Palmquist v. Selvik

    111 F.3d 1332 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 141 times
    Holding municipality was not deliberately indifferent for failure to train because the lack of training was not sufficiently obvious and any inadequacy was not sufficiently likely to result in a constitutional violation
  5. Sherrod v. Berry

    856 F.2d 802 (7th Cir. 1988)   Cited 179 times
    Holding that under circumstances of case, fact that suspect was unarmed was irrelevant to excessive force claim where officer reasonably believed he was armed
  6. United States v. Irvin

    87 F.3d 860 (7th Cir. 1996)   Cited 81 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding extensive gang evidence and prosecutor's closing argument based on gang membership harmless when defendant himself testified to gang membership and evidence was overwhelming
  7. Joseph v. Brierton

    739 F.2d 1244 (7th Cir. 1984)   Cited 53 times
    Granting a new trial when the district judge's instructions were not enough to counter the serious misconduct
  8. Van Bumble v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    407 F.3d 823 (7th Cir. 2005)   Cited 21 times
    Finding that "it was appropriate for the jury to receive" evidence that put a witness' "credibility to the test"
  9. Charles v. Cotter

    867 F. Supp. 648 (N.D. Ill. 1994)   Cited 32 times
    Concluding that the witness's felony convictions were probative evidence of his credibility and that any prejudicial effect was reduced by limiting the cross-examination "to the crime charged, the date, and the disposition (i.e., guilty or not guilty-not length of sentence) with respect to felony convictions during the past ten years"
  10. United States v. Doe

    149 F.3d 634 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that questioning a handcuffed defendant in the back of a police car in a remote location for more than an hour was not sufficient to render a waiver involuntary
  11. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 45,747 times   319 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness
  12. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 26,595 times   252 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the Daubert standard
  13. Rule 403 - Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons

    Fed. R. Evid. 403   Cited 22,463 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks
  14. Rule 404 - Character Evidence; Other Crimes, Wrongs, or Acts.

    Fed. R. Evid. 404   Cited 16,636 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that even uncharged similar acts can be probative of a defendant's intent and knowledge concerning charged offenses
  15. Rule 401 - Test for Relevant Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 401   Cited 13,356 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Providing that evidence is relevant if " it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action"
  16. Rule 402 - General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence

    Fed. R. Evid. 402   Cited 6,633 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Providing relevant evidence is admissible unless prohibited by the United States Constitution, a federal statute, the Federal Rules of Evidence, or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court