66 Cited authorities

Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio
475 U.S. 574 (1986) Cited 113,238 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
Young v. United States
535 U.S. 43 (2002) Cited 422 times
Holding that three-year lookback period applicable to tax claims in bankruptcy is subject to equitable tolling
Muhammad v. Close
379 F.3d 413 (6th Cir. 2004) Cited 532 times
Holding that on remand the district court should consider whether the temporal proximity between an inmate's grievances against a prison officer and that officer's charges against the inmate alone could create a genuine issue of material fact that the officer was acting with a retaliatory motive when he brought the charges against the inmate
Combs v. International Ins. Co.
354 F.3d 568 (6th Cir. 2004) Cited 341 times
Holding that, where a state's supreme court has not ruled on a particular issue, federal courts should predict how the supreme court would rule
Adkins v. Wolever
554 F.3d 650 (6th Cir. 2009) Cited 291 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding federal courts have broad discretion in such decisions
Liberte Capital Group, LLC v. Capwill
462 F.3d 543 (6th Cir. 2006) Cited 185 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that once assets are placed in receivership, the receivership court has a valid interest in the value of the claims and the cost of defending any suit as a drain on receivership assets
Jones v. General Motors Corp.
939 F.2d 380 (6th Cir. 1991) Cited 235 times
Holding that "it is well settled that a plaintiff may not create a factual issue for the purpose of defeating a motion for summary judgment by filing an affidavit contradicting a statement the plaintiff made in a prior deposition"
Freeland v. Enodis Corp.
540 F.3d 721 (7th Cir. 2008) Cited 143 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that there is “reasonably equivalent value” where “payment of the accrued interest constituted ‘dollar-for-dollar forgiveness of a contractual debt.’ ”
Bailey v. V O Press Co., Inc.
770 F.2d 601 (6th Cir. 1985) Cited 264 times
Stating that federal courts should look to "all relevant data" when predicting a state supreme court's decision, including state appeals court rulings, restatements of the law, academic publications, and the majority rule
Investors REIT One v. Jacobs
46 Ohio St. 3d 176 (Ohio 1989) Cited 232 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that for "claims brought under R.C. 2305.09, * * * the date of discovery may toll the running of the governing statute of limitations until the plaintiff discovers or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have discovered the complained-of injury"
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 329,129 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
Section 108 - Extension of time
11 U.S.C. § 108 Cited 2,065 times 12 Legal Analyses
Granting to "the trustee" a two-year extension from the date of the order for relief of the debtor's time to commence an action
Section 2305.09 - Four years - certain torts
Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.09 Cited 954 times 1 Legal Analyses
Relating to the recovery of personal property
Section 2305.19 - Saving in case of reversal
Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.19 Cited 827 times
Saving statute triggered when "the plaintiff fails otherwise than upon the merits"
Section 1701.60 - Contract, action or transaction not void or voidable
Ohio Rev. Code § 1701.60 Cited 32 times
Outlining statutory duty of care for directors

Morgan et al v. The Antioch Company Litigation Trust Company

66 Cited authorities

Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them

Holding that three-year lookback period applicable to tax claims in bankruptcy is subject to equitable tolling

Holding that, where a state's supreme court has not ruled on a particular issue, federal courts should predict how the supreme court would rule

Holding federal courts have broad discretion in such decisions

Recognizing that once assets are placed in receivership, the receivership court has a valid interest in the value of the claims and the cost of defending any suit as a drain on receivership assets

Holding that "it is well settled that a plaintiff may not create a factual issue for the purpose of defeating a motion for summary judgment by filing an affidavit contradicting a statement the plaintiff made in a prior deposition"

Holding that there is “reasonably equivalent value” where “payment of the accrued interest constituted ‘dollar-for-dollar forgiveness of a contractual debt.’ ”

Stating that federal courts should look to "all relevant data" when predicting a state supreme court's decision, including state appeals court rulings, restatements of the law, academic publications, and the majority rule

Holding that for "claims brought under R.C. 2305.09, * * * the date of discovery may toll the running of the governing statute of limitations until the plaintiff discovers or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have discovered the complained-of injury"

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Granting to "the trustee" a two-year extension from the date of the order for relief of the debtor's time to commence an action

Relating to the recovery of personal property

Saving statute triggered when "the plaintiff fails otherwise than upon the merits"

Outlining statutory duty of care for directors