8 Cited authorities

U.S. v. Perry
908 F.2d 56 (6th Cir. 1990) Cited 511 times
In Perry, this Court elaborated on the clearly erroneous standard and held "a decision must strike us as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must... strike us as wrong with the force of a five-week-old unrefrigerated dead fish.'"
In re Dow Corning Corp.
456 F.3d 668 (6th Cir. 2006) Cited 243 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that courts must use contract principles when interpreting a confirmed bankruptcy plan, "since the plan is effectively a new contract between the debtor and its creditors"
Parts and Elec. Motors, Inc. v. Sterling Elec
866 F.2d 228 (7th Cir. 1988) Cited 338 times 1 Legal Analyses
Describing the exploitation of aftermarket customers as a "suicidal" business practice
Tennessee Prot. Advocacy v. Wells
371 F.3d 342 (6th Cir. 2004) Cited 97 times
Discussing how individuals with traumatic brain injuries may be covered by the P & A statutory scheme
Owners Insurance Company v. Barone
832 F. Supp. 2d 804 (N.D. Ohio 2011) Cited 4 times
Case No. 3:10 CV 116. 2011-06-6 OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. John BARONE, II, et al., Defendant. Andrew J. Ayers, Robert J. Bahret, Bahret & Associates, Holland, OH, for Plaintiff. Heather L. Allred, John Czarnecki, Cooper & Walinski, Toledo, OH, for Defendant. KATZ Andrew J. Ayers, Robert J. Bahret, Bahret & Associates, Holland, OH, for Plaintiff. Heather L. Allred, John Czarnecki, Cooper & Walinski, Toledo, OH, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION KATZ, District Judge. This matter is before
Rule 54 - Judgment; Costs
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 Cited 41,193 times 141 Legal Analyses
Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"
Rule 7 - Pleadings Allowed; Form of Motions and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 7 Cited 7,520 times 2 Legal Analyses
Defining "pleadings" for purposes of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Section 1129 - Confirmation of plan
11 U.S.C. § 1129 Cited 4,331 times 104 Legal Analyses
Requiring payment of property whose "value, as of the effective date of the plan" equals or exceeds the value of the creditor's claim

Morgan et al v. The Antioch Company Litigation Trust Company

8 Cited authorities

In Perry, this Court elaborated on the clearly erroneous standard and held "a decision must strike us as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must... strike us as wrong with the force of a five-week-old unrefrigerated dead fish.'"

Holding that courts must use contract principles when interpreting a confirmed bankruptcy plan, "since the plan is effectively a new contract between the debtor and its creditors"

Describing the exploitation of aftermarket customers as a "suicidal" business practice

Discussing how individuals with traumatic brain injuries may be covered by the P & A statutory scheme

Holding party seeking fees may additionally seek "nontaxable expenses"

Defining "pleadings" for purposes of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Requiring payment of property whose "value, as of the effective date of the plan" equals or exceeds the value of the creditor's claim