§Why CasetextPricing

Monroe v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation et al

Memorandum of Law re MOTION for Relief from Order Defendant GlaxoSmithKline LLC's Supplemental Authority in Support of its Motion for Relief from Order

3 Cited authorities

  1. Ramos v. Quien

    631 F. Supp. 2d 601 (E.D. Pa. 2008)   Cited 89 times
    Holding that remand motion based on procedural defects, such as untimely removal, "is clearly waived if it is not raised within thirty days after the filing of the notice of removal."

  2. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 50,129 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."

  3. Section 1447 - Procedure after removal generally

    28 U.S.C. § 1447   Cited 33,714 times   110 Legal Analyses
    Holding that with exceptions not relevant here, "[a]n order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise"