550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 266,932 times 365 Legal Analyses
Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
Holding that "[t]he district court did not err in considering the geographic proximity of use as an eighth factor demonstrating the unlikelihood of confusion."
Holding color functional under traditional test and stating "[w]here the design is functional under the traditional test, there is no need to proceed further to consider if there is a competitive necessity for the feature"
Finding that appellants might satisfy the priority requirement because appellants' federal registration of the mark was prior to appellees' first use of the mark
15 U.S.C. § 1115 Cited 1,906 times 34 Legal Analyses
Providing that registration of a mark "shall be prima facie evidence of the validity of the registered mark" but "shall not preclude another person from proving any legal or equitable defense or defect"
Ga. Code § 10-1-370 Cited 128 times 13 Legal Analyses
This part shall be known and may be cited as the "Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act." OCGA § 10-1-370 Amended by 2017 Ga. Laws 275,§ 10, eff. 5/9/2017.