28 Cited authorities

AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
563 U.S. 333 (2011) Cited 3,741 times 601 Legal Analyses
Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"
Nken v. Holder
556 U.S. 418 (2009) Cited 3,274 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that "courts must be mindful that the Government's role as the respondent in every removal proceeding does not make the public interest in each individual one negligible"
Moses H. Cone Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp.
460 U.S. 1 (1983) Cited 11,873 times 47 Legal Analyses
Holding stay order appealable under § 1291 where it put the litigant "effectively out of court," and "surrender[ed] jurisdiction of a federal suit to a state court"
Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. Animalfeeds Intr.
559 U.S. 662 (2010) Cited 1,666 times 210 Legal Analyses
Holding that a prudential ripeness argument was waived
Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.
500 U.S. 20 (1991) Cited 3,018 times 59 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1994 ed.), may be subject to compulsory arbitration
Shady Grove Orthopedic v. Allstate Ins. Co.
559 U.S. 393 (2010) Cited 1,153 times 44 Legal Analyses
Holding that rules of civil procedure allowing multiple claims to be litigated together "neither change plaintiffs' separate entitlements to relief nor abridge defendants' rights; they alter only how the claims are processed"
Iskanian v. CSL Transportation Los Angeles, LLC
59 Cal.4th 348 (Cal. 2014) Cited 690 times 144 Legal Analyses
Holding that arbitration provisions banning class-action litigation or collective arbitration of employment-related claims are enforceable under the NLRA and the FAA's saving clause, but also holding that arbitration provisions banning representative claims under California's Private Attorneys General Act violates that Act
Leiva-Perez v. Holder
640 F.3d 962 (9th Cir. 2011) Cited 486 times
Holding that the stay inquiry is “flexible” and involves an equitable balancing of the stay factors
Kilgore v. KeyBank, Nat'l Ass'n
718 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2013) Cited 256 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding arbitration provision not procedurally unconscionable if signatories able to opt out
Britton v. Co-op. Banking Group
916 F.2d 1405 (9th Cir. 1990) Cited 320 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the appeal of district court's order denying motion to compel arbitration does not preclude district court from proceeding with the case on the merits

Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

28 Cited authorities

Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"

Holding that "courts must be mindful that the Government's role as the respondent in every removal proceeding does not make the public interest in each individual one negligible"

Holding stay order appealable under § 1291 where it put the litigant "effectively out of court," and "surrender[ed] jurisdiction of a federal suit to a state court"

Holding that a prudential ripeness argument was waived

Holding that a claim arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1994 ed.), may be subject to compulsory arbitration

Holding that rules of civil procedure allowing multiple claims to be litigated together "neither change plaintiffs' separate entitlements to relief nor abridge defendants' rights; they alter only how the claims are processed"

Holding that the stay inquiry is “flexible” and involves an equitable balancing of the stay factors

Holding arbitration provision not procedurally unconscionable if signatories able to opt out

Holding that the appeal of district court's order denying motion to compel arbitration does not preclude district court from proceeding with the case on the merits