62 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,142 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.

    530 U.S. 133 (2000)   Cited 21,087 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, since the 58-year-old plaintiff was fired by his 60-year-old employer, there was an inference that "age discrimination was not the motive"
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green

    411 U.S. 792 (1973)   Cited 52,185 times   95 Legal Analyses
    Holding in employment discrimination case that statistical evidence of employer's general policy and practice may be relevant circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent behind individual employment decision
  4. Cracco v. Vitran Express, Inc.

    559 F.3d 625 (7th Cir. 2009)   Cited 959 times
    Holding that good cause was shown when lack of timely answer was the result of inadvertence and was not the result of willful ignorance of the pending litigation
  5. Bombard v. Fort Wayne Newspapers, Inc.

    92 F.3d 560 (7th Cir. 1996)   Cited 970 times
    Holding that statements made by a doctor to a patient are not admissible under Fed.R.Evid. 803 because the rule does not except statements by the person providing medical care
  6. Hodgens v. Gen. Dynamics Corp.

    144 F.3d 151 (1st Cir. 1998)   Cited 810 times
    Holding that this court may affirm a grant of summary judgment "on any independently sufficient ground made manifest by the record"
  7. Bryant v. Madigan

    84 F.3d 246 (7th Cir. 1996)   Cited 711 times
    Holding that the ADA "would not be violated by a prison's simply failing to attend to the medical needs of its disabled prisoners."
  8. Darst v. Interstate

    512 F.3d 903 (7th Cir. 2008)   Cited 435 times
    Holding that the FMLA does not provide a remedy for an employer's breach of its obligations under 29 C.F.R. § 825.305(d) unless the violation prejudiced the employee by causing the loss of FMLA leave to which he was entitled; explaining that the employer's breach in that case caused the employee no harm because the employee could not show that he could have cured the deficiency in a manner that would have demonstrated that he was actually entitled to FMLA leave
  9. Beck v. University of Wisconsin Board of Regents

    75 F.3d 1130 (7th Cir. 1996)   Cited 619 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer sufficiently participated in the interactive process in part because the employee “offer[ed] no evidence that” the alternative accommodation proposed by her employer “was an unreasonable accommodation”
  10. Burnett v. LFW Inc.

    472 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2006)   Cited 376 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a question of material fact existed where an employer's classification of an employee's conduct as insubordinate stemmed in large measure from its mistaken belief that the employee was not entitled to FMLA leave
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,637 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 12112 - Discrimination

    42 U.S.C. § 12112   Cited 13,505 times   159 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing failure to accommodate as form of discrimination
  13. Section 12102 - Definition of disability

    42 U.S.C. § 12102   Cited 10,781 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing ADA claim where plaintiff is "regarded as" disabled
  14. Section 12111 - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 12111   Cited 8,023 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the definition of "person" in 42 U.S.C. § 2000e for purposes of Title I of the ADA
  15. Section 2601 - Findings and purposes

    29 U.S.C. § 2601   Cited 7,645 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Finding that there is inadequate job security for employees who have serious health conditions that prevent them from working for temporary periods
  16. Section 2612 - Leave requirement

    29 U.S.C. § 2612   Cited 4,940 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Granting qualifying employees twelve weeks of FMLA leave in a 12-month period
  17. Section 2614 - Employment and benefits protection

    29 U.S.C. § 2614   Cited 1,833 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the substantive right to reinstatement "shall [not] be construed to entitle any restored employee to ... any right, benefit, or position of employment other than any right, benefit or position to which the employee would have been entitled had the employee not taken the leave."
  18. Section 2613 - Certification

    29 U.S.C. § 2613   Cited 560 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Permitting employers to require certification
  19. Section 1630.2 - Definitions

    29 C.F.R. § 1630.2   Cited 8,333 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding that major life activity is substantially limited if plaintiff is "significantly restricted in the ability to perform either a class of jobs or a broad range of jobs in various classes as compared to the average person having comparable training, skills and abilities"
  20. Section 825.305 - Certification, general rule

    29 C.F.R. § 825.305   Cited 429 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that when an "employer requests certification, the employer must also advise an employee of the anticipated consequences of an employee's failure to provide adequate certification"
  21. Section 825.115 - Continuing treatment

    29 C.F.R. § 825.115   Cited 372 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Defining "[c]hronic serious health condition" as one that requires visits at least twice per year for treatment
  22. Section 825.113 - Serious health condition

    29 C.F.R. § 825.113   Cited 315 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that “bed-rest, drinking fluids, exercise, and other similar activities that can be initiated without a visit to a health care provider” are not sufficient
  23. Section 825.307 - Authentication and clarification of medical certification for leave taken because of an employee's own serious health condition or the serious health condition of a family member; second and third opinions

    29 C.F.R. § 825.307   Cited 148 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that an "employer may not request additional information from the employee's health care provider" to verify adequacy of medical certification
  24. Section 825.123 - Unable to perform the functions of the position

    29 C.F.R. § 825.123   Cited 51 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Incorporating by reference 29 C.F.R. § 1630.2(n)
  25. Section 825.125 - Definition of health care provider

    29 C.F.R. § 825.125   Cited 25 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Defining “health care provider” to include “physician assistants ... authorized to practice under State law and ... performing within the scope of their practice as defined under State law”
  26. Section 825.119 - Leave for treatment of substance abuse

    29 C.F.R. § 825.119   Cited 9 times   3 Legal Analyses

    (a) Substance abuse may be a serious health condition if the conditions of §§ 825.113 through 825.115 are met. However, FMLA leave may only be taken for treatment for substance abuse by a health care provider or by a provider of health care services on referral by a health care provider. On the other hand, absence because of the employee's use of the substance, rather than for treatment, does not qualify for FMLA leave. (b) Treatment for substance abuse does not prevent an employer from taking employment

  27. Section MPSW 6.02 - Certified advanced practice social worker

    Wis. Admin. Code MPSW § 6.02

    A certified advanced practice social worker may evaluate and intervene in complex difficulties in psychosocial functioning. Intervention plans may include counseling of individuals, families, and groups; advocacy; referral to community resources; and facilitation of organizational change to meet social needs based on a psychosocial evaluation. A certified advanced practice social worker may engage in psychotherapeutic activities only under the supervision of a person authorized by the board or by

  28. Section MPSW 1.09 - Substance abuse disorder specialty

    Wis. Admin. Code MPSW § 1.09

    (1) USE OF TITLE AND SCOPE OF PRACTICE. (a) A person certified by the board may use the title "alcohol and drug counselor" or "chemical dependency counselor" only if the person is credentialed as a substance abuse counselor under s. 440.88, Stats., or satisfies the educational and supervised training requirements established in this section. (b) A person who is certified by the board may treat substance use disorder as a specialty if the person is credentialed under s. 440.88, Stats., or satisfies