Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.
555 U.S. 7 (2008) Cited 17,299 times 71 Legal AnalysesHolding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"
Frank's GMC Truck Center, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
847 F.2d 100 (3d Cir. 1988) Cited 513 timesHolding that "purely economic injury, compensable in money, cannot satisfy the irreparable injury requirement" when the defendant "has failed to articulate and adduce proof of actual or imminent harm which cannot otherwise be compensated by money damages"
McNeil v. Heartland
511 F.3d 350 (3d Cir. 2007) Cited 130 timesHolding that the Pennsylvania trademark dilution statute continued to require a showing of actual dilution after the Lanham Act was revised to include likelihood of dilution
Petrello v. White
344 F. App'x 651 (2d Cir. 2009) Cited 11 timesStating that a fraud in the inducement claim requires that the material misrepresentations be false and known to be false by the defendant
Stratton Group, Ltd. v. Sprayregen
458 F. Supp. 1216 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) Cited 32 timesInterpreting New York law
Deligiannis v. Pepsico, Inc.
757 F. Supp. 241 (S.D.N.Y. 1991) Cited 13 timesNo. 88 Civ. 6243 (SWK). January 29, 1991 Thompson, Hine and Flory, Akron, Ohio by Richard E. Guster, Kevin J. Breen, Dowdy, Kitchens, Whittington Burkhalter, McComb, Miss. by Ronald L. Whittington, Vincent J. DeSalvo, Baton Rouge, La. and Boyle, Voegler Haimes, New York City (Michael J. Levin, of counsel), for plaintiffs. Kaye, Scholer, Fierman Hays Handler, New York City by Fred A. Freund, Richard M. Steuer, Sally J. Forman and David I. Lewittes, for defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KRAM
Rule 7 - Pleadings Allowed; Form of Motions and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 7 Cited 7,742 times 2 Legal AnalysesDefining "pleadings" for purposes of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure