§Why CasetextPricing

Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida v. Cypress et al

MOTION to Compel Tribe's Rule 30

4 Cited authorities

  1. Braswell v. United States

    487 U.S. 99 (1988)   Cited 375 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that neither a corporation nor its representatives have a Fifth Amendment privilege

  2. Quantachrome Corp. v. Micromeritics Instrument Corp.

    189 F.R.D. 697 (S.D. Fla. 1999)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that because a party caused the need for further depositions, that party should bear the costs of retaking the depositions

  3. NEW WORLD NETWORK LTD. v. M/V NORWEGIAN SEA

    Case No. 05-22916-CIV-JORDAN/TORRES (S.D. Fla. Apr. 6, 2007)   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Case No. 05-22916-CIV-JORDAN/TORRES. April 6, 2007 ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDERS FROM DISCOVERY REQUESTS EDWIN TORRES, Magistrate Judge This matter is before the Court upon two motions for protective order filed by Defendants in response to Plaintiffs deposition and production requests: Defendants' Motion for Protective Order on Plaintiff's Second Amended Notice of Taking Corporate Representative Deposition [D.E. 89], and Defendants' for Protective Order on Plaintiffs Second

  4. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 45,912 times   320 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness