§Why CasetextPricing

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Fresenius Kabi USA, Llc

BRIEF in Opposition

24 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 237,184 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife

    504 U.S. 555 (1992)   Cited 28,088 times   139 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the elements of standing "must be supported in the same way as any other matter on which the plaintiff bears the burden of proof"

  3. Tolan v. Cotton

    572 U.S. 650 (2014)   Cited 4,999 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in determining whether a dispute about a material fact is "genuine," the trial court must not weigh the evidence and instead must draw all reasonable inference in the nonmoving party's favor

  4. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas

    493 U.S. 215 (1990)   Cited 2,378 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden is on the plaintiff to allege facts sufficient to establish jurisdiction (quoting McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U.S. 178, 189 (1936))

  5. Keene Corp. v. United States

    508 U.S. 200 (1993)   Cited 607 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1500 jurisdiction "depends upon the state of things at the time of the action brought" and that "once the lines are drawn" limitations such as § 1500 "must be neither disregarded nor evaded"

  6. Blunt v. Lower Merion Sch. Dist.

    767 F.3d 247 (3d Cir. 2014)   Cited 844 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Title IX deliberate indifference standard is applicable to Title VI claims

  7. Public Int. Res. Group v. Magnesium Elektron

    123 F.3d 111 (3d Cir. 1997)   Cited 431 times
    Holding plaintiffs lacked standing to assert generalized claim that they were injured by knowing that creek was being polluted

  8. Bd. of Trust. of L.S.J.U. v. Roche Mol. Sys.

    563 U.S. 776 (2011)   Cited 83 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting statutory interpretation that conflicts with “two centuries of patent law”

  9. Vaupel Textilmaschinen KG v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.P.A.

    944 F.2d 870 (Fed. Cir. 1991)   Cited 290 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the termination provisions in the agreements were entirely consistent with an assignment."

  10. Sicom Systems, Ltd. v. Agilent Technologies

    427 F.3d 971 (Fed. Cir. 2005)   Cited 181 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a licensor remained the patentee based on rights to sue for noncommercial infringement and to consent to assignment

  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 330,128 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  12. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 96,086 times   662 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  13. Rule 16 - Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 16   Cited 34,123 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the sanctions authorized by Rule 37(b)

  14. Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 33   Cited 10,976 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Rule 30(b)

  15. Section 282 - Presumption of validity; defenses

    35 U.S.C. § 282   Cited 3,906 times   139 Legal Analyses
    Granting a presumption of validity to patents