36 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,784 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 266,697 times   365 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  3. Knievel v. ESPN

    393 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 2,314 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that incorporation by reference doctrine extends “to situations in which the plaintiff's claim depends on the contents of a document, the defendant attaches the document to its motion to dismiss, and the parties do not dispute the authenticity of the document, even though the plaintiff does not explicitly allege the contents of that document in the complaint”
  4. Harris v. Cnty. of Orange

    682 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 1,179 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the court "may take judicial notice of undisputed matters of public record . . . including documents on file in federal or state courts"
  5. Ileto v. Glock Inc.

    349 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 1,299 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding gun manufacturers liable because they were "in the best position to protect against the risk of harm" caused by the purchase of illegal guns from all of the different sellers to whom they distributed
  6. Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network

    18 F.3d 752 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 1,850 times
    Holding that a national organization was not sufficiently connected to a "place" open to the public
  7. Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc.

    143 F.3d 1293 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 1,045 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the court is “not required to accept as true conclusory allegations which are contradicted by documents referred to in the complaint”
  8. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire Cas. Co.

    270 F.3d 778 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 922 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an initial “discharge of debt by a bankruptcy court, under these circumstances, is sufficient acceptance to provide a basis for judicial estoppel, even if the discharge is later vacated”
  9. Cholla Ready Mix, Inc. v. Civish

    382 F.3d 969 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 482 times
    Holding religious use of historical site by others was not attributable to the federal government
  10. Thinket Ink Information Resources, Inc. v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.

    368 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 313 times
    Holding that the district properly dismissed the claims based “[a]lthough the Federal Arbitration Act ‘provides for a stay pending compliance with a contractual arbitration clause . . . a request for a stay is not mandatory'”
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,981 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1692k - Civil liability

    15 U.S.C. § 1692k   Cited 6,112 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Holding debt collectors civilly liable for illicit debt collection practices
  13. Section 1692g - Validation of debts

    15 U.S.C. § 1692g   Cited 3,439 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Setting forth requirements for disputing a debt
  14. Section 63.60.010 - Property right-Use of name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness

    Wash. Rev. Code § 63.60.010   Cited 30 times

    Every individual or personality has a property right in the use of his or her name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness. Such right exists in the name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness of individuals or personalities deceased before, on, or after June 11, 1998. This right shall be freely transferable, assignable, and licensable, in whole or in part, by any otherwise permissible form of inter vivos or testamentary transfer, including without limitation a will or other testamentary instrument

  15. Section 63.60.070 - Exemptions from use restrictions-When chapter does not apply

    Wash. Rev. Code § 63.60.070   Cited 11 times
    Providing that "the use of a name . . . in connection with matters of cultural, historical, political, religious, educational, newsworthy, or public interest, including, without limitation, comment, criticism, satire, and parody relating thereto, shall not constitute a use for which consent is required under this chapter."