§Why CasetextPricing

McPadden v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al

MOTION in Limine to to Preclude Testimony from Jennifer Fonseca, Deborah Genna, and Tiffany Ghent No. 15

2 Cited authorities

  1. Ingalls v. Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc.

    Civil No. 10-cv-242-PB (D.N.H. Mar. 1, 2011)   Cited 3 times
    Denying plaintiff's motion to compel production of evidence bearing on the asserted truth of his alleged whistleblowing statements; noting that, for purposes of his New Hampshire Whistleblowers' Protection Act claim, "whether or not [defendant employer] actually violated any law is beside the point; what matters is whether plaintiff had reasonable cause to believe that [defendant employer] had violated the law"

  2. Rule 403 - Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons

    Fed. R. Evid. 403   Cited 22,498 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks