§Why CasetextPricing

McCarthy v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al

OPPOSITION

6 Cited authorities

  1. Lewis v. District

    523 F.3d 730 (7th Cir. 2008)   Cited 283 times
    Holding that jury could find that employer violated the FMLA if the employer "held [the employee] to the unrealistic expectation that she should accomplish satisfactorily all of the duties of [her] position during her period of FMLA-protected intermittent leave"

  2. Staley v. Owens

    367 F. App'x 102 (11th Cir. 2010)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that isolated inmate assaults over several years "is not sufficient to establish that there was a history of widespread abuses that supervisors failed to reasonably respond to"

  3. Murphy v. Eddie Murphy Prod

    611 F.3d 322 (7th Cir. 2010)   Cited 33 times
    Finding prejudice to the non-movant where the district court had already granted an extension and the case had been lingering for three years

  4. United States v. Denkers

    No. C 09-03403 WHA (N.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2010)

    No. C 09-03403 WHA. August 12, 2010 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND REINSTATING THE MARCH 29 SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge This action has followed a tortuous path since the government's motion for summary judgment was granted on March 29, 2010 (Dkt. No. 48). Just days after that order was filed, defendants moved for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of virtually every issue resolved by the March 29 order (Dkt. No. 50). The motion was denied, since defendants

  5. Hernandez v. KSM Properties

    NO. 2:05-cv-1963-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. May. 25, 2007)

    NO. 2:05-cv-1963-MCE-EFB. May 25, 2007 ORDER MORRISON ENGLAND JR., District Judge Through the present action, Plaintiff Victoria Hernandez ("Plaintiff") alleges disability discrimination in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181, et seq. ("ADA") and related provisions sounding under state law pursuant to the Unruh Civil Rights Act (California Civil Code § 51, et seq.). The parties do not dispute that this matter was resolved through execution of a Settlement

  6. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 48,387 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."