§Why CasetextPricing

McCarthy v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al

OPPOSITION

6 Cited authorities

  1. Hemmings v. Tidyman's Inc.

    285 F.3d 1174 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 388 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a cap on Title VII compensatory damages does not violate the Seventh Amendment

  2. Golden Gate Res. Asso. v. City

    512 F.3d 1112 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 200 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Granting stay because "individuals without health coverage are significantly less likely to seek timely medical care than those with health coverage," and consequently are more likely to "seek emergency treatment" from government-funded hospitals and clinics

  3. Baty v. Willamette Indus., Inc.

    172 F.3d 1232 (10th Cir. 1999)   Cited 127 times
    Holding that the provision for punitive damages in the statute itself constitute notice.

  4. E.E.O.C. v. Dinuba Medical Clinic

    222 F.3d 580 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 114 times
    Holding that filing of assault and battery police report constitutes statutorily protected expression

  5. Hudson v. Chertoff

    473 F. Supp. 2d 1286 (S.D. Fla. 2007)   Cited 6 times
    Distinguishing Copley

  6. Section 1981a - Damages in cases of intentional discrimination in employment

    42 U.S.C. § 1981a   Cited 4,156 times   55 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "additional remedies under Federal law are needed to deter unlawful harassment and intentional discrimination in the workplace"