95 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,544 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 266,461 times   365 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 236,142 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
  4. Holland v. Florida

    560 U.S. 631 (2010)   Cited 14,076 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 2254 does not preclude equitable tolling of a statute of limitations based on attorney misconduct in habeas proceedings
  5. Woodford v. NGO

    548 U.S. 81 (2006)   Cited 16,030 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1997e requires "proper exhaustion"
  6. Heck v. Humphrey

    512 U.S. 477 (1994)   Cited 29,214 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court must dismiss a § 1983 suit if a judgment in favor of the plaintiff would necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction or sentence
  7. Ross v. Blake

    578 U.S. 632 (2016)   Cited 6,443 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, other than the requirement that a remedy be "available," the text of the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA") "suggests no limits on an inmate's obligation to exhaust -- irrespective of any ‘special circumstances’ "
  8. Miller v. Alabama

    567 U.S. 460 (2012)   Cited 6,836 times   63 Legal Analyses
    Holding mandatory life without parole sentences unconstitutional for all juvenile offenders
  9. Bousley v. United States

    523 U.S. 614 (1998)   Cited 13,616 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the rule announced in Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472, which narrowed the scope of the term "use" in § 924(c), applied retroactively
  10. Wilkinson v. Dotson

    544 U.S. 74 (2005)   Cited 6,135 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a prisoner in state custody cannot use a § 1983 action to challenge the fact or duration of his confinement, but must instead seek federal habeas corpus relief
  11. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 486,625 times   688 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation
  12. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,715 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  13. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,637 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  14. Section 2254 - State custody; remedies in Federal courts

    28 U.S.C. § 2254   Cited 204,450 times   341 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a determination of a factual issue made by a State court shall be presumed to be correct" and "[t]he applicant shall have the burden of rebutting the presumption of correctness by clear and convincing evidence"
  15. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 156,116 times   193 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  16. Section 2255 - Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence

    28 U.S.C. § 2255   Cited 129,331 times   129 Legal Analyses
    Adopting one-year limitations period for §2255 motions
  17. Section 2244 - Finality of determination

    28 U.S.C. § 2244   Cited 65,283 times   166 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 2255 incorporates § 2244(b) as part of the certification procedures of § 2244 and instructing that "the district court must dismiss the motion that we have allowed the applicant to file, without reaching the merits of the motion, if the court finds that the movant has not satisfied the requirements for the filing of such a motion."
  18. Section 1997e - Suits by prisoners

    42 U.S.C. § 1997e   Cited 53,727 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that prisoners must exhaust "available" administrative remedies before filing suit in federal court
  19. Section Amendment VIII - Further Guarantees in Criminal Cases

    U.S. Const. amend. VIII   Cited 9,136 times
    Prohibiting "cruel and unusual punishments"
  20. Section 5-101 - Three-year limitation in general

    Md. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 5-101   Cited 730 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Prescribing general three-year statute of limitations for civil claims
  21. Section 12.08.01.18 - Consideration for Parole

    Md. Code Regs. 12.08.01.18   Cited 9 times
    Requiring parole commission to consider "[a]ge at the time the crime was committed," "[t]he individual's level of maturity and sense of responsibility at the time ... the crime was committed," "[w]hether influence or pressure from other individuals contributed to the commission of the crime," "[t]he home environment and family relationships at the time the crime was committed," "[t]he individual's educational background and achievement at the time the crime was committed," and "[o]ther factors or circumstances unique to prisoners who committed crimes at the time the individual was a juvenile that the Commissioner determines to be relevant"
  22. Section 12.08.01.15 - Commutation

    Md. Code Regs. 12.08.01.15   Cited 3 times

    A. Any inmate may request of the Commission a recommendation to the Governor that the sentence be commuted when all legal remedies are exhausted and the circumstances of the case are unusual. The Commission may entertain these requests at a parole hearing, and in its discretion may deny the request or submit it to the Governor with a recommendation. A sentence can be commuted to time served and the inmate released, or to a number of years. Once commuted, the Commission, in its discretion, may release