§Why CasetextPricing

Martinez-Rodriguez et al v. Bank of America et al

REPLY

38 Cited authorities

  1. Corley v. United States

    556 U.S. 303 (2009)   Cited 756 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "statute should be construed so that effect is given to all its provisions, so that no part will be inoperative or superfluous"

  2. Flores-Figueroa v. United States

    556 U.S. 646 (2009)   Cited 588 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the adverb "knowingly" in a criminal statute applies "to all the subsequently listed elements of the crime"

  3. Hibbs v. Winn

    542 U.S. 88 (2004)   Cited 573 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[b]ecause [28 U.S.C.] § 2101(c)'s 90-day limit [for petition for certiorari] had not yet expired, the clock could still be reset"

  4. Equilon Enterprises, Llc. v. Consumer Cause, Inc.

    29 Cal.4th 53 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 1,791 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that fee shifting under the Anti-SLAPP statute without a showing of the plaintiff's "intent to chill" free speech did not violate the Constitution or "inappropriately punish plaintiffs," especially given that a plaintiff is burdened by payment of attorney fees "only when the plaintiff burdens free speech with an unsubstantiated claim"

  5. Flatley v. Mauro

    39 Cal.4th 299 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 1,324 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that anti-SLAPP protection is not available where the "assertedly protected speech or petition activity [is] illegal as a matter of law"

  6. Rusheen v. Cohen

    37 Cal.4th 1048 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 1,157 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding California's litigation privilege precludes liability arising from noncommunicative acts that are necessarily related to enforcing a judgment

  7. Silberg v. Anderson

    50 Cal.3d 205 (Cal. 1990)   Cited 1,019 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the litigation privilege applied, even after the finality of a marriage dissolution decree, to an attorney who made statements during a marriage dissolution proceeding

  8. ComputerXpress, Inc. v. Jackson

    93 Cal.App.4th 993 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 639 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff "failed to establish probability of success under California's anti-SLAPP statute on abuse of process claim because plaintiff alleged misuse of administrative process of Federal Communications Commission rather than abuse of judicial process"

  9. Kashian v. Harriman

    98 Cal.App.4th 892 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 440 times
    Holding that even the "fil[ing] [of] meritless lawsuits on behalf of 'sham plaintiffs'" was "essentially communicative conduct" to which the litigation privilege applied, "even though it also may have involved noncommunicative acts"

  10. Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSB

    32 Cal.4th 350 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 397 times
    Holding that civilians who provide information leading to an arrest cannot be held liable for false arrest

  11. Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 803   Cited 12,700 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities

  12. Rule 701 - Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 701   Cited 5,747 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Requiring lay opinion testimony to be "rationally based on the witness's perception"

  13. Section 425.16 - California anti-SLAPP law

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16   Cited 2,846 times   110 Legal Analyses
    Reversing district court's denial of anti-SLAPP motion as moot and remanding for consideration of the motion, including attorney's fees

  14. Rule 807 - Residual Exception

    Fed. R. Evid. 807   Cited 1,564 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Requiring "sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness" under the residual exception to the hearsay rule

  15. Section 470 - Forgery

    Cal. Pen. Code § 470   Cited 1,365 times
    Defining the crime of forgery

  16. Section 530.5 - Unlawful obtaining or use or personal identifying information

    Cal. Pen. Code § 530.5   Cited 1,177 times
    Making false sworn statement to induce notarial act affecting title to real property

  17. Section 5318 - Compliance, exemptions, and summons authority

    31 U.S.C. § 5318   Cited 250 times   115 Legal Analyses
    Setting forth legal mechanisms to ensure compliance with federal reporting requirements

  18. Section 5312 - Definitions and application

    31 U.S.C. § 5312   Cited 108 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "financial institution" means ... any credit union"

  19. Section 101 - Agency

    31 U.S.C. § 101   Cited 15 times

    In this title, "agency" means a department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States Government. 31 U.S.C. § 101 Pub. L. 97-258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 877. HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Revised Section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large) 101 (no source). The section is included to avoid the necessity for defining "agency" each time it is used in the revised title.

  20. Section 208.20 - Authority, purpose, and scope

    12 C.F.R. § 208.20   Cited 10 times

    (a)Authority. Subpart B of Regulation H ( 12 CFR part 208 , subpart B) is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System under 12 U.S.C. 24 ; sections 9 , 11 and 21 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 321-338a , 248(a) , 248(c) , and 481-486 ) ; sections 1814, 1816, 1818, 1823(j), 1831o, 1831p-1 and 1831r-1 of the FDI Act (12 U.S.C. 1814 , 1816 , 1818 , 1823(j) , 1831o , 1831p-1 and 1831r-1 ) ; and the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of