61 Cited authorities

  1. Colorado River Water Cons. Dist. v. U.S.

    424 U.S. 800 (1976)   Cited 8,189 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in limited circumstances, federal courts should abstain from deciding a case when there are related proceedings pending in state court
  2. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.

    561 U.S. 247 (2010)   Cited 1,459 times   177 Legal Analyses
    Holding extraterritorial application of a statute is a merits question, not a question of subject matter jurisdiction
  3. Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno

    454 U.S. 235 (1981)   Cited 4,740 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that potential change in law cannot, by itself, fend off dismissal under forum non conveniens absent showing that new law is "clearly inadequate or unsatisfactory"
  4. Lee v. City of L.A.

    250 F.3d 668 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 10,599 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court erred in granting a motion to dismiss "by relying on extrinsic evidence and by taking judicial notice of disputed matters of fact to support its ruling"
  5. Ernst Ernst v. Hochfelder

    425 U.S. 185 (1976)   Cited 3,485 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 9(f) “contains a state-of-mind condition requiring something more than negligence”
  6. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.

    426 U.S. 438 (1976)   Cited 2,480 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding that materiality may be resolved at summary judgment "if the established omissions are so obviously important to an investor that reasonable minds cannot differ on the question of materiality"
  7. Pinker v. Roche Holdings Ltd.

    292 F.3d 361 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 2,326 times
    Holding that in ruling on a Rule 12(b) motion we must accept all of the plaintiff's allegations as true and construct disputed facts in favor of the plaintiff.
  8. Securities v. Zandford

    535 U.S. 813 (2002)   Cited 520 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the SEC may bring a public enforcement action against a broker who accepted payment for securities that he never delivered
  9. Dole Food Co. v. Watts

    303 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 1,068 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because purposeful direction was established, it was "obvious" that the second prong of the minimum contacts test was also satisfied
  10. Laub v. United States Department of the Interior

    342 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 459 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that party seeking discovery must show that denial resulted in prejudice
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 346,412 times   923 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 111,518 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"
  13. Section 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction

    28 U.S.C. § 1367   Cited 61,875 times   78 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in civil actions proceeding in federal court based solely on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court "shall not have supplemental jurisdiction" over "claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule . . . 24" or "over claims by persons . . seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24," if "exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332"
  14. Section 1404 - Change of venue

    28 U.S.C. § 1404   Cited 28,387 times   184 Legal Analyses
    Granting Class Plaintiffs' motion to transfer action in order to "facilitate a unified settlement approval process together with the class action cases in" In re Amex ASR
  15. Section 78c - Definitions and application

    15 U.S.C. § 78c   Cited 1,666 times   87 Legal Analyses
    Exempting certain "note" with maturities of less than nine months from the definition of "security" under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  16. Rule 706 - Court-Appointed Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 706   Cited 1,365 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the court to appoint its own expert witness
  17. Rule 44.1 - Determining Foreign Law

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 44.1   Cited 1,206 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Noting the court's determination of foreign law is treated as a question of law
  18. Section 78f - National securities exchanges

    15 U.S.C. § 78f   Cited 271 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that exchanges register with the SEC and comply with various requirements to constitute a “national securities exchange”
  19. Section 240.12g3-2 - Exemptions for American depositary receipts and certain foreign securities

    17 C.F.R. § 240.12g3-2   Cited 11 times
    Requiring foreign issuers to furnish the SEC with shareholder communications and other materials as are required to be prepared pursuant to home market regulations in order to maintain exemption from the reporting requirements applicable to American companies
  20. Section 239.36 - Form F-6, for registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of depositary shares evidenced by American Depositary Receipts

    17 C.F.R. § 239.36   Cited 3 times

    Form F-6 may be used for the registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) of Depositary shares evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) issued by a depositary against the deposit of the securities of a foreign issuer (regardless of the physical location of the certificates) if the following conditions are met: (a) The holder of the ADRs is entitled to withdraw the deposited securities at any time subject only to (1) temporary delays caused by closing transfer books of