§Why CasetextPricing

Manwin Licensing International S a r l et al v. ICM Registry LLC et al

REPLY in support of MOTION to Strike Counterclaims Pursuant to California Code of Civil Proc. Sec. 425.16 76

27 Cited authorities

  1. Navellier v. Sletten

    29 Cal.4th 82 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 1,920 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding a claim for relief filed in federal district court is protected activity

  2. Equilon Enterprises, Llc. v. Consumer Cause, Inc.

    29 Cal.4th 53 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 1,789 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that fee shifting under the Anti-SLAPP statute without a showing of the plaintiff's "intent to chill" free speech did not violate the Constitution or "inappropriately punish plaintiffs," especially given that a plaintiff is burdened by payment of attorney fees "only when the plaintiff burdens free speech with an unsubstantiated claim"

  3. Flatley v. Mauro

    39 Cal.4th 299 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 1,323 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that anti-SLAPP protection is not available where the "assertedly protected speech or petition activity [is] illegal as a matter of law"

  4. Batzel v. Smith

    333 F.3d 1018 (9th Cir. 2003)   Cited 359 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion is appealable under § 1291

  5. Neville v. Chudacoff

    160 Cal.App.4th 1255 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 268 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to be privileged under section 47, a statement must be "reasonably relevant" to pending or contemplated litigation

  6. Salma v. Capon

    161 Cal.App.4th 1275 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 253 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allowing amendment of a complaint after the motion but before the court ruled would undermine the purpose of the SLAPP statue

  7. Church of Scientology v. Wollersheim

    42 Cal.App.4th 628 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 337 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that matters of public interest "include product liability suits, real estate or investment scams, etc."

  8. Haight Ashbury Free Clinics, Inc. v. Happening House Ventures

    184 Cal.App.4th 1539 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 191 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that whether a cause of action is subject to a motion to strike turns on whether the gravamen of the cause of action targets protected activity

  9. Fox Searchlight Pictures v. Paladino Inc.

    89 Cal.App.4th 294 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 241 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding party met anti-SLAPP's step one burden where the court could not say "from the record before [it]" that the party's use of confidential information was "not an act in furtherance of the preparation" of lawsuit

  10. Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc.

    296 F.3d 894 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 222 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "Barbie Girl" diluted Mattel's "Barbie" mark

  11. Rule 408 - Compromise Offers and Negotiations

    Fed. R. Evid. 408   Cited 4,262 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding that premature deliberations constituted an internal jury influence subject to the post-verdict restrictions of Rule 606(b)

  12. Section 425.16 - California anti-SLAPP law

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16   Cited 2,833 times   110 Legal Analyses
    Reversing district court's denial of anti-SLAPP motion as moot and remanding for consideration of the motion, including attorney's fees