§Why CasetextPricing

Manidhari Gums & Chemicals v. Caremoli USA, Inc.

Reply Memorandum in Support of 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment

10 Cited authorities

  1. Hunt v. Cromartie

    526 U.S. 541 (1999)   Cited 2,878 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the court must resolve all reasonable inferences and doubts in the nonmoving party's favor and construe all evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party

  2. Turner v. Giles

    514 U.S. 1108 (1995)   Cited 89 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Simmons is only applicable where the state argues future dangerousness and the defendant is legally ineligible for parole

  3. Ezzone v. Riccardi

    525 N.W.2d 388 (Iowa 1994)   Cited 85 times
    Finding error preserved when challenge was hypertechnical

  4. Dethmers Manufacturing Company v. Automatic Equip. Mfg.

    23 F. Supp. 2d 974 (N.D. Iowa 1998)   Cited 39 times
    Finding under Iowa choice-of-law rules that a claim for a breach of an alleged contract to keep an invention confidential was governed by the law of Nebraska, which barred punitive damages, rather than by the law of Iowa, California, or Nevada, as the defendant was a Nebraska corporation, and negotiations and performance occurred primarily in Nebraska, and negotiations only incidentally began in California and terminated in Nevada

  5. Hussemann v. Hussemann

    847 N.W.2d 219 (Iowa 2014)   Cited 9 times
    In Hussemann ex rel. Ritter v. Hussemann, 847 N.W.2d 219 (Iowa 2014), the Iowa Supreme Court weighed a Florida choice-of-law provision in a post-nuptial agreement—a contract that would be unenforceable under Iowa law.

  6. Bulk Oil (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Sun Oil Trading Co.

    697 F.2d 481 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 43 times
    Rejecting plaintiff's argument that it was deprived of its ability to use nearly $4 million to which it was entitled because plaintiff would have used the funds to pay off a separate loan

  7. Amera-Seiki Corp. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

    721 F.3d 582 (8th Cir. 2013)   Cited 6 times

    No. 12–2739. 2013-07-23 AMERA–SEIKI CORPORATION, Plaintiff–Appellee v. The CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant–Appellant. Howard B. Randell, argued, Chicago, IL (Sean M. O'Brien, Des Moines, IA, Howard B. Randell, Chicago, IL, Davis J. Kim, Chicago, IL, Thomas M. Boes, Des Moines, IA, on the brief), for Appellant. Matthew L. Preston, argued, Cedar Rapids, IA (Brad J. Brady, on the brief), for Appellee. RILEY Howard B. Randell, argued, Chicago, IL (Sean M. O'Brien, Des Moines, IA, Howard B. Randell

  8. Weitz Co. v. Lexington Ins. Co.

    982 F. Supp. 2d 975 (S.D. Iowa 2013)   Cited 5 times

    No. 4:10–cv–00254. 2013-11-13 The WEITZ COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY; Allied World Assurance Company, Inc.; Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company; Essex Insurance Company; Lloyd's of London, et al., a/k/a Underwriters at Lloyd's; and various unknown insurers hereby named John Doe Insurers, Defendants. Laura A. Freid–Studlo, David T. Dekker, Laura R. Thomson, Melissa C. Lesmes, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Washington, DC, John A. Templer, Jr., Richard J. Kirschman

  9. PURINA MILLS, L.L.C. v. LESS

    No. C02-4100-MWB (N.D. Iowa Dec. 22, 2003)   Cited 13 times
    Discussing the lost profits remedy of U.C.C. § 2-708

  10. Dumont Tel. Co. v. Power & Tel. Supply Co.

    962 F. Supp. 2d 1064 (N.D. Iowa 2013)   Cited 4 times

    No. C 13–3030–MWB. 2013-08-26 DUMONT TELEPHONE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. POWER & TELEPHONE SUPPLY COMPANY, CSI Digital, Inc., and I.P. Net, LLC, Defendants. Steven L. Nelson, Davis Brown Koehn Shors & Roberts, PC, Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff. Mark Allen Schultheis, Nyemaster, Goode, Voigts, West, Hansell & O'Brien, PC, Bradley R. Kruse, Jonathan M. Gallagher, Brown Winick Graves Gross Baskerville & Schoenebaum, PLC, Des Moines, IA, Keith T. Grumer, Grumer & Macaluso, PA, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Rodney