12 Cited authorities

Levin v. Commerce Energy
560 U.S. 413 (2010) Cited 394 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that comity required plaintiffs' claim to proceed originally in state court where plaintiffs alleged "discriminatory taxation in violation of the Commerce and Equal Protection Clauses"
Brown Shoe Co. v. United States
370 U.S. 294 (1962) Cited 1,825 times 32 Legal Analyses
Holding judgment final and appealable where district court passed on every prayer for relief in the complaint and ordered full divestiture of stock, although court had not yet approved a divestiture plan
California v. American Stores Co.
495 U.S. 271 (1990) Cited 122 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that a statute entitling a party to “have injunctive relief” entitles parties to both prohibitory and mandatory injunctions under the “traditional principles of equity”
Federal Trade Commission v. Procter & Gamble Co.
386 U.S. 568 (1967) Cited 152 times 8 Legal Analyses
Rejecting Court of Appeal's reliance on four years of post-merger data as "misapprehend[ing] the standards for its review and the standards applicable in a [Section 7 of the Clayton Act] proceeding."
Triad Systems Corp. v. Southeastern Express
64 F.3d 1330 (9th Cir. 1995) Cited 125 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that placing the burden of determining how to comply with an injunction on the defendant was "appropriate" because it was the defendant who "is the infringer"
Gonzales v. Texaco Inc.
344 F. App'x 304 (9th Cir. 2009) Cited 5 times
Suggesting all this language is dicta
CBS Inc. v. Liederman
866 F. Supp. 763 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) Cited 6 times
Limiting the strength of a mark to the television industry
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 95,836 times 658 Legal Analyses
Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
Rule 401 - Test for Relevant Evidence
Fed. R. Evid. 401 Cited 13,499 times 35 Legal Analyses
Providing that evidence is relevant if " it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action"
Section 15 - Suits by persons injured
15 U.S.C. § 15 Cited 5,688 times 35 Legal Analyses
Granting private right of action to anyone who has been injured "by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws ..."
Section 18 - Acquisition by one corporation of stock of another
15 U.S.C. § 18 Cited 1,508 times 51 Legal Analyses
Barring an acquisition "where in any line of commerce ... the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition"
Section 26 - Injunctive relief for private parties; exception; costs
15 U.S.C. § 26 Cited 1,457 times 1 Legal Analyses
Authorizing injunctive relief against "threatened loss or damage by a violation of the antitrust laws"

Malaney et al v. UAL Corporation et al

12 Cited authorities

Holding that comity required plaintiffs' claim to proceed originally in state court where plaintiffs alleged "discriminatory taxation in violation of the Commerce and Equal Protection Clauses"

Holding judgment final and appealable where district court passed on every prayer for relief in the complaint and ordered full divestiture of stock, although court had not yet approved a divestiture plan

Holding that a statute entitling a party to “have injunctive relief” entitles parties to both prohibitory and mandatory injunctions under the “traditional principles of equity”

Rejecting Court of Appeal's reliance on four years of post-merger data as "misapprehend[ing] the standards for its review and the standards applicable in a [Section 7 of the Clayton Act] proceeding."

Holding that placing the burden of determining how to comply with an injunction on the defendant was "appropriate" because it was the defendant who "is the infringer"

Suggesting all this language is dicta

Limiting the strength of a mark to the television industry

Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

Providing that evidence is relevant if " it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action"

Granting private right of action to anyone who has been injured "by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws ..."

Barring an acquisition "where in any line of commerce ... the effect of such acquisition may be substantially to lessen competition"

Authorizing injunctive relief against "threatened loss or damage by a violation of the antitrust laws"