444 U.S. 472 (1980) Cited 1,034 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court properly assessed attorney's fees based on the total fund available to the prevailing class rather than the amount actually recovered
Holding that decision to grant or reject objector's motion for discovery regarding fairness of settlement depended on "whether or not the District Court had before it sufficient facts intelligently to approve the settlement offer"
472 U.S. 299 (1985) Cited 366 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that in pari delicto would not prevent defrauded tippee from bringing suit against defrauding tipper, at least absent further inquiry into “relative culpabilities” of tippee and tipper
Holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in finding the absence of substantial objections by class members weighed in favor of approval