§Why CasetextPricing

Mahapatra v. Fuqi International, Inc. et al

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 108 AMENDED MOTION for Settlement Final Approval. and for Attorneys' Fees. Document

43 Cited authorities

  1. Tellabs v. Makor Issues Rights

    551 U.S. 308 (2007)   Cited 9,143 times   104 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a strong inference is one that is "cogent and at least as compelling as any opposing inference"

  2. Basic Inc. v. Levinson

    485 U.S. 224 (1988)   Cited 3,349 times   308 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the District Court appropriately certified the class based on the presumption of reliance

  3. Missouri v. Jenkins

    491 U.S. 274 (1989)   Cited 2,328 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that reasonable attorney's fees includes the costs of paralegals' time

  4. Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert

    444 U.S. 472 (1980)   Cited 1,032 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court properly assessed attorney's fees based on the total fund available to the prevailing class rather than the amount actually recovered

  5. New York Ass'n for Retarded Child. v. Carey

    711 F.2d 1136 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 2,061 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding unreasonable the addition of contingency bonuses to fee awards to non-profit law offices

  6. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc.

    396 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 756 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that decision to grant or reject objector's motion for discovery regarding fairness of settlement depended on "whether or not the District Court had before it sufficient facts intelligently to approve the settlement offer"

  7. Goldberger v. Integrated Resources, Inc.

    209 F.3d 43 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 872 times
    Holding that risk must be measured at the time the lawsuit is filed

  8. Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. Berner

    472 U.S. 299 (1985)   Cited 366 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in pari delicto would not prevent defrauded tippee from bringing suit against defrauding tipper, at least absent further inquiry into “relative culpabilities” of tippee and tipper

  9. In re Rite Aid Corp. Securities Litigation

    396 F.3d 294 (3d Cir. 2005)   Cited 435 times
    Holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in finding the absence of substantial objections by class members weighed in favor of approval

  10. Lindy Bros. Bldrs., Phila. v. Am. R. S. San

    487 F.2d 161 (3d Cir. 1973)   Cited 875 times
    Finding "value of an attorney's time generally is reflected in his normal billing rate"

  11. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 7,474 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party

  12. Section 77z-1 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 77z-1   Cited 454 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Discussing "[t]otal attorneys' fees and expenses" that can be awarded by court