§Why CasetextPricing

Madison Square Garden, L.P. v. National Hockey League et al

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 63 MOTION to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Partial Summary Judgment.. Document

47 Cited authorities

  1. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 266,542 times   365 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

  2. New Hampshire v. Maine

    532 U.S. 742 (2001)   Cited 4,543 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under the doctrine of judicial estoppel, “New Hampshire is equitably barred from asserting—contrary to its position in the 1970's litigation—that the inland Piscataqua River boundary runs along the Maine shore”

  3. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.

    429 U.S. 477 (1977)   Cited 2,063 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mere economic loss does not amount to an antitrust injury under the antitrust laws

  4. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.

    467 U.S. 752 (1984)   Cited 1,433 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a parent and a wholly owned subsidiary have a "complete unity of interest" because "their objectives are common" and "their general corporate actions are guided or determined not by two separate corporate consciousness, but one"

  5. Verizon Comm. v. Law Offices of Trinko

    540 U.S. 398 (2004)   Cited 506 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Holding even a monopolist has no duty to cooperate with rivals

  6. Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.

    479 U.S. 104 (1986)   Cited 679 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Clayton Act plaintiff "must show a threat of antitrust injury" to warrant injunctive relief

  7. Kramer v. Time Warner Inc.

    937 F.2d 767 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 1,988 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court may consider matters of which judicial notice may be taken under Federal Rule of Evidence 201

  8. Rothman v. Gregor

    220 F.3d 81 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 1,322 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the date of the filing of the motion to amend constitutes the date the action was commenced for statute of limitations purposes" when "the plaintiff seeks to add a new defendant" (quoting Nw. Nat’l Ins. Co. v. Alberts , 769 F. Supp. 498, 510 (S.D.N.Y.1991) )

  9. City of Mt. Pleasant v. Assoc. Elec. Co-op

    838 F.2d 268 (8th Cir. 1988)   Cited 1,774 times
    Holding that a rural electrical cooperative consisting of three tiers of cooperatives with interlocking ownership was a single entity because member cooperatives shared a common goal of providing low-cost electricity

  10. Texaco v. Dagher

    547 U.S. 1 (2006)   Cited 245 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Finding such an agreement reasonable and not anti-competitive for purposes of § 1 liability

  11. Section 15 - Suits by persons injured

    15 U.S.C. § 15   Cited 5,671 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Granting private right of action to anyone who has been injured "by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws ..."

  12. Section 1 - Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty

    15 U.S.C. § 1   Cited 2,903 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Making illegal "[e]very contract, combination ..., or conspiracy, in restraint of trade"

  13. Section 15b - Limitation of actions

    15 U.S.C. § 15b   Cited 898 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Establishing a four-year limitations period for antitrust claims