92 Cited authorities

  1. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 268,629 times   366 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  2. Erickson v. Pardus

    551 U.S. 89 (2007)   Cited 62,210 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint must "give the defendant fair notice of what the . . . claim is and the grounds upon which it rests"
  3. Mitsubishi Motors v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth

    473 U.S. 614 (1985)   Cited 4,244 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act emphatically favors arbitration
  4. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.

    429 U.S. 477 (1977)   Cited 2,068 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mere economic loss does not amount to an antitrust injury under the antitrust laws
  5. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research

    401 U.S. 321 (1971)   Cited 2,509 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that claims based on continuing conspiracies accrue each time "a defendant commits an act that injures a plaintiffs business"
  6. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.

    467 U.S. 752 (1984)   Cited 1,434 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a parent and a wholly owned subsidiary have a "complete unity of interest" because "their objectives are common" and "their general corporate actions are guided or determined not by two separate corporate consciousness, but one"
  7. Iqbal v. Hasty

    490 F.3d 143 (2d Cir. 2007)   Cited 1,826 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Twombly's plausibility standard "obliges a pleader to amplify a claim with some factual allegations in those contexts where such amplification is needed to render the claim plausible"
  8. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.

    551 U.S. 877 (2007)   Cited 461 times   75 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the rule of reason rather than per se illegality applies to vertical price restraints
  9. Kassner v. 2nd Avenue Delicatessen Inc.

    496 F.3d 229 (2d Cir. 2007)   Cited 1,644 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that amended complaint must be "sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss under [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] 12(b)"
  10. Klehr v. A. O. Smith Corp.

    521 U.S. 179 (1997)   Cited 541 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "reasonable diligence" was required to invoke the doctrine of fraudulent concealment in the context of civil RICO by analogy to antitrust cases