17 Cited authorities

  1. Clinton v. Jones

    520 U.S. 681 (1997)   Cited 2,694 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding in Section 1983 action no absolute immunity for damages arising from "unofficial conduct"
  2. Landis v. North American Co.

    299 U.S. 248 (1936)   Cited 8,277 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a decision to stay proceedings "calls for the exercise of judgment, which must weigh competing interests and maintain an even balance"
  3. Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.

    398 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2005)   Cited 1,513 times
    Holding a stay, although "theoretically" subject to modification, was a reviewable collateral order because "the district court did not impose a time limit on the stay or note circumstances that might result in its modification"
  4. Leyva v. Certified Grocers of Cal., Ltd.

    593 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 1,078 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the arbitrator does have the power to determine whether various provisions in the contract are void
  5. Hoeun Yong v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

    208 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 453 times
    Holding that the district court abused its discretion by staying a habeas petition pending resolution of an appeal in a case before the Ninth Circuit presenting similar issues to be decided
  6. Telemac Corp. v. Teledigital, Inc.

    450 F. Supp. 2d 1107 (N.D. Cal. 2006)   Cited 114 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding that four requests for reexamination that were missing necessary elements suggested movant was taking tactical advantage of opportunities for delay
  7. Town of North Bonneville v. Callaway

    10 F.3d 1505 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 42 times
    Applying issue preclusion based on an unpublished Federal Circuit decision modifying a decision in the Court of Federal Claims
  8. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp. v. Kama

    Civ. No. 14-00137 ACK-KSC (D. Haw. Oct. 3, 2014)   Cited 7 times

    Civ. No. 14-00137 ACK-KSC 10-03-2014 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT H.Y. KAMA, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P., AND FHLMC S/A 3-DAY ARC-125949, Counterclaim Defendant and Third-Party Defendants. Alan C. Kay Senior United States District Judge ORDER DENYING COUNTERCLAIM/THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF'S

  9. Pagels v. P.V.S. Chemicals, Inc.

    266 A.D.2d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that, even if the defendants met their initial burden on summary judgment, the "plaintiff's submissions raise triable issues of fact" as to whether she suffered serious injury under § 5102(d) because "differences of opinion among the medical experts with respect to the nature, cause and extent of plaintiff's injuries raise issues of credibility that must be resolved by a jury"
  10. Asustek Computer Inc. v. Ricoh Company, Ltd.

    No. C 07-01942 MHP (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2007)   Cited 11 times
    In ASUSTek, the district found that there was minimal risk of duplication based on the pending appeal and that staying the litigation would prejudice the nonmoving party by requiring it to continue living in the shadow of threatened patent litigation.
  11. Section 702 - Right of review

    5 U.S.C. § 702   Cited 7,053 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Granting judicial review of "agency action"
  12. Section 704 - Actions reviewable

    5 U.S.C. § 704   Cited 4,250 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Granting judicial review over " final agency action"
  13. Section 921 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 921   Cited 4,065 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Adopting this definition
  14. Rule 41 - Mandate: Contents; Issuance and Effective Date; Stay

    Fed. R. App. P. 41   Cited 2,669 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "[t]he court may shorten ... by order" the time for issuing its mandate
  15. Section 2101 - Supreme Court; time for appeal or certiorari; docketing; stay

    28 U.S.C. § 2101   Cited 657 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Allowing a Justice of the Supreme Court to grant an extension of up to sixty days for good cause shown