21 Cited authorities

  1. Terra Intern., Inc. v. Miss. Chem. Corp.

    119 F.3d 688 (8th Cir. 1997)   Cited 857 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that strategic or artfully drawn pleadings . . . will not work to circumvent an otherwise applicable forum selection clause," and that such a clause may apply to tort or other non-contract claims where such claims depend on the existence of a contractual relationship, relate to interpretation of the contract, or involve the same operative facts as a parallel breach of contract claim
  2. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works

    796 F.2d 217 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 1,098 times
    Holding that a decision to transfer venue under § 1404 relies heavily on consideration of the interests of justice, which "may be determinative in a particular case, even if the convenience of the parties and witnesses might call for a different result."
  3. Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.

    431 F.2d 22 (3d Cir. 1970)   Cited 1,112 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Finding transfer under § 1404 inappropriate because, among other reasons, there was "a very real question" whether personal jurisdiction was proper over one of the defendants in the transferee forum
  4. In re National Presto Industries, Inc.

    347 F.3d 662 (7th Cir. 2003)   Cited 349 times
    Holding that "[w]hen plaintiff and defendant are in different states there is no choice of forum that will avoid imposing inconvenience; and when the inconvenience of the alternative venues is comparable there is no basis for a change of venue; the tie is awarded to the plaintiff"
  5. Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.

    104 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D.D.C. 2000)   Cited 100 times
    Finding that transfer of venue was supported by plaintiff's previous decision to litigate "clearly related" action in transferee forum
  6. Nelson v. Soo Line Railroad

    58 F. Supp. 2d 1023 (D. Minn. 1999)   Cited 74 times
    Finding that § 60 does not support a legal damages claim
  7. In re Triton Ltd. Securities Litigation

    70 F. Supp. 2d 678 (E.D. Tex. 1999)   Cited 71 times
    Finding venue proper because allegedly misleading press releases were sent into the district
  8. Original Creatine Patent Co. v. Met-Rx USA, Inc.

    387 F. Supp. 2d 564 (E.D. Va. 2005)   Cited 25 times
    Finding four percent of defendant's sales in Virginia did not create sufficient connection with Virginia for purpose of motion to transfer venue
  9. Alden Corp. v. Eazypower Corp.

    CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:03-CV-1257 (JCH) (D. Conn. Dec. 5, 2003)   Cited 23 times
    Finding no "race to the courthouse" where patentee's letters, though strongly evidencing an intent to sue, did not specify a date or a forum, nor did they state that suit was inevitable
  10. Pressdough of Bismarck, LLC v. A & W Rests., Inc.

    587 F. Supp. 2d 1079 (D.N.D. 2008)   Cited 12 times
    Refusing to enforce conflicting forum selection clauses “in order to avoid expensive piecemeal litigation”