§Why CasetextPricing

Low v. Trump University, LLC et al

RESPONSE re Request for Judicial Notice [Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Notice of Supplemental Authority and Request for Judicial Notice]

4 Cited authorities

  1. American Pipe Construction Co. v. Utah

    414 U.S. 538 (1974)   Cited 2,114 times   162 Legal Analyses
    Holding the commencement of a class action "suspends the applicable statute of limitations as to all asserted members of the class who would have been parties had the suit been permitted to continue as a class action"

  2. Clemens v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

    530 F.3d 852 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 910 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "claims under the Magnuson–Moss Act stand or fall with express and implied warranty claims under state law"

  3. Kamm v. Cal. City Dev. Co.

    509 F.2d 205 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 293 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the propriety of a class action cannot be determined in some cases without discovery, and to deny discovery in such cases is an abuse of discretion

  4. Rule 201 - Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts

    Fed. R. Evid. 201   Cited 28,241 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding "[n]ormally, in deciding a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, courts must limit their inquiry to the facts stated in the complaint and the documents either attached to or incorporated in the complaint. However, courts may also consider matters of which they may take judicial notice."