154 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 255,028 times   280 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 268,776 times   367 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  3. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 217,036 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  4. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio

    475 U.S. 574 (1986)   Cited 113,493 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
  5. 389 Orange Street Partners v. Arnold

    179 F.3d 656 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 1,454 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "vague claims" cannot generate a factual dispute "adequate to defeat summary judgment"
  6. Intri-Plex v. Crest

    499 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 960 times
    Holding courts, when ruling on motion to dismiss, "may not consider material beyond the complaint," other than material as to which judicial notice may be taken
  7. Coto Settlement v. Eisenberg

    593 F.3d 1031 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 814 times
    Holding that on a motion to dismiss, a court may consider documents outside the complaint when the contents of the document are alleged in the complaint, the document's authenticity is not in question, and there are no disputed issues as to the document's relevance
  8. Central Mortg. v. Morgan Stanley Mortg. Del

    27 A.3d 531 (Del. 2011)   Cited 754 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the existence of a general statement that plaintiff met conditions precedent was sufficient to avoid dismissal
  9. Nemec v. Shrader

    991 A.2d 1120 (Del. 2010)   Cited 692 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that unjust enrichment claim requires five elements: " an enrichment, an impoverishment, a relation between the enrichment and impoverishment, the absence of justification, and the absence of a remedy provided by law"
  10. Osborn v. Kemp

    991 A.2d 1153 (Del. 2010)   Cited 592 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts must give each term of a contract effect so as not to render any part of the contract extraneous
  11. Section 636 - Jurisdiction, powers, and temporary assignment

    28 U.S.C. § 636   Cited 504,232 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a party fails to object to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, our review of the district court's resulting decision is for plain error so long as the party "has been served with notice that [this consequence] will result from a failure to object"
  12. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 348,310 times   930 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  13. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 329,940 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  14. Rule 72 - Magistrate Judges: Pretrial Order

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 72   Cited 168,170 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Granting a party fourteen days to object to a Magistrate Judge's non-dispositive order
  15. Section 5-701 - Agreements required to be in writing

    N.Y. Gen. Oblig. Law § 5-701   Cited 1,718 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Stating that an oral agreement is void if “[b]y its terms is not to be performed within one year from the making thereof”
  16. Section 740 ILCS 160/5

    740 ILCS 160/5   Cited 413 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Listing eleven
  17. Section 251 - Merger or consolidation of domestic corporations [For application of this section, see 79 Del. Laws, c. 327,§8 and 80 Del. Laws, c. 265,§17]

    Del. Code tit. 8 § 251   Cited 197 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a vote by the majority of the outstanding stock
  18. Section 1304 - Transfers fraudulent as to present and future creditors

    Del. Code tit. 6 § 1304   Cited 166 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Cross-referencing Del. Code Ann. tit. 6, § 1304
  19. Section 42.230 - Office of judge in construing instruments

    ORS § 42.230   Cited 125 times
    Stating that when constructing an instrument, the court should simply "ascertain and declare what it is, in terms or in substance, contained therein, not to insert what has been omitted, or to omit what has been inserted" and when possible to give effect to all provisions
  20. Section 2714 - Necessity of writing for contracts; definition of writing; evidence

    Del. Code tit. 6 § 2714   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting enforcement of an obligation lasting more than a year, unless the contract giving rise to the obligation is reduced to a signed writing
  21. Rule 202 - Judicial Notice of Law

    Del. R. Evid. 202   Cited 94 times

    (a)Judicial Notice of Laws. Every court in this State must take judicial notice of the United States Constitution, case law relating thereto, and the Constitution, common law, case law and statutes of this State. (1) Every court in this State may take judicial notice of the common law, case law and statutes of the United States and every state, territory and jurisdiction of the United States. (2) Reasonable notice of a request for judicial notice must be given to the adverse parties. (b)Information