9 Cited authorities

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
477 U.S. 242 (1986) Cited 240,643 times 39 Legal Analyses
Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America
142 N.J. 520 (N.J. 1995) Cited 4,668 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the inquiry involved in a ruling on a motion for summary judgment or for a directed verdict necessarily implicates the substantive evidentiary standard of proof that would apply at the trial on the merits" (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 252, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) )
Judson v. Peoples Bank Trust Co. of Westfield
17 N.J. 67 (N.J. 1954) Cited 891 times 3 Legal Analyses
Discussing a New Jersey statute providing for contribution where injury or damage is suffered by any person as result of wrongful act, neglect, or default of joint tortfeasors, which indicates legislative policy of allowing contribution even among intentional, including fraudulent, joint wrongdoers
Maher v. New Jersey Transit R.O
125 N.J. 455 (N.J. 1991) Cited 78 times
Holding that RLA did not preempt plaintiff's CEPA claim
Shanley Fisher, P.C. v. Sisselman
215 N.J. Super. 200 (App. Div. 1987) Cited 86 times
Holding that acts or threats do not constitute duress unless they are wrongful
Schueler v. Strelinger
43 N.J. 330 (N.J. 1964) Cited 85 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding that no individual cause of action under the Act because the claim "must be brought by an administrator Ad prosequendam in case of intestacy, or by the executor where . . . decedent left a will"
Walck v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.
267 A.2d 508 (N.J. 1970) Cited 39 times
Holding occupational disease arose out of employment if precipitating event was "peculiar" to the workplace, or held some "essential relation to the work or its nature"
Toy v. Rickert
53 N.J. Super. 27 (App. Div. 1958) Cited 30 times
Stating that except in limited circumstances such as areas of "common knowledge," the standard of care must be established by expert testimony
Jones v. Stess
111 N.J. Super. 283 (App. Div. 1970) Cited 9 times
Finding the common knowledge exception applicable where a podiatrist dropped an instrument on the patient's leg resulting in amputation

Lomando v. United States of America

9 Cited authorities

Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

Discussing a New Jersey statute providing for contribution where injury or damage is suffered by any person as result of wrongful act, neglect, or default of joint tortfeasors, which indicates legislative policy of allowing contribution even among intentional, including fraudulent, joint wrongdoers

Holding that RLA did not preempt plaintiff's CEPA claim

Holding that acts or threats do not constitute duress unless they are wrongful

Finding that no individual cause of action under the Act because the claim "must be brought by an administrator Ad prosequendam in case of intestacy, or by the executor where . . . decedent left a will"

Holding occupational disease arose out of employment if precipitating event was "peculiar" to the workplace, or held some "essential relation to the work or its nature"

Stating that except in limited circumstances such as areas of "common knowledge," the standard of care must be established by expert testimony

Finding the common knowledge exception applicable where a podiatrist dropped an instrument on the patient's leg resulting in amputation