16 Cited authorities

U.S. v. Heller
551 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir. 2009) Cited 422 times
Holding that defendant's confession was voluntary despite being under the influence of codeine
Sperberg v. Goodyear Tire Rubber Co.
519 F.2d 708 (6th Cir. 1975) Cited 610 times
Recognizing that, when confronted with a request to bar unspecified evidence, the "better practice is to deal with questions of admissibility of evidence as they arise [in actual trial]"
Matter of Oil Spill by the Amoco Cadiz
954 F.2d 1279 (7th Cir. 1992) Cited 227 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that question of whether defendant tortfeasors were entitled to reduction in plaintiffs' claims by amount of alleged nonparty tortfeasor's responsibility "was one of substantive law"
McEwen v. City of Norman
926 F.2d 1539 (10th Cir. 1991) Cited 199 times
Holding where a party objected to the admissibility of evidence in a motion in limine, but did not interpose an objection at trial, the issue was not preserved on appeal
Alvord-Polk, Inc. v. F. Schumacher Co.
37 F.3d 996 (3d Cir. 1994) Cited 155 times
Holding to similar effect expressly as to evidence of opportunity and impliedly as to evidence of means
Pacific Gas v. U.S.
536 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2008) Cited 42 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that because Yankee Atomic Electric Co.'s re-rack efforts were reasonable, foreseeable and caused by the Government's partial breach, their successful implementation was irrelevant
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
454 F. Supp. 2d 966 (C.D. Cal. 2006) Cited 34 times
Finding authentication requirement met when party opposing summary judgment had produced the documents in discovery and concluding documents were non-hearsay under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d) since they were created by company's employees
Annex Books v. City of Indianapolis
581 F.3d 460 (7th Cir. 2009) Cited 28 times
Concluding that a showing that the city's evidence was not germane to the restrictions it enacted in combination with the presentation of a study by Linz raised a genuine issue of material fact and required remand for an evidentiary hearing
Gibson v. County of Riverside
181 F. Supp. 2d 1057 (C.D. Cal. 2002) Cited 36 times
Holding that a suit against the State may not be filed unless the Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board has acted on a claim or the claim "has been deemed to have been rejected by the board"
Reid Bros. Logging Co. v. Ketchikan Pulp Co.
699 F.2d 1292 (9th Cir. 1983) Cited 68 times
Holding that report prepared at the request and substantial participation of a company, and then subsequently distributed throughout the company, was “authorized” by that company
Rule 403 - Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons
Fed. R. Evid. 403 Cited 22,855 times 84 Legal Analyses
Adopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks
Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay
Fed. R. Evid. 801 Cited 19,283 times 75 Legal Analyses
Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party
Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness
Fed. R. Evid. 803 Cited 12,788 times 85 Legal Analyses
Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities
Rule 7 - Pleadings Allowed; Form of Motions and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 7 Cited 7,674 times 2 Legal Analyses
Defining "pleadings" for purposes of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Log Cabin Republicans v. United States of America et al

16 Cited authorities

Holding that defendant's confession was voluntary despite being under the influence of codeine

Recognizing that, when confronted with a request to bar unspecified evidence, the "better practice is to deal with questions of admissibility of evidence as they arise [in actual trial]"

Holding that question of whether defendant tortfeasors were entitled to reduction in plaintiffs' claims by amount of alleged nonparty tortfeasor's responsibility "was one of substantive law"

Holding where a party objected to the admissibility of evidence in a motion in limine, but did not interpose an objection at trial, the issue was not preserved on appeal

Holding to similar effect expressly as to evidence of opportunity and impliedly as to evidence of means

Holding that because Yankee Atomic Electric Co.'s re-rack efforts were reasonable, foreseeable and caused by the Government's partial breach, their successful implementation was irrelevant

Finding authentication requirement met when party opposing summary judgment had produced the documents in discovery and concluding documents were non-hearsay under Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d) since they were created by company's employees

Concluding that a showing that the city's evidence was not germane to the restrictions it enacted in combination with the presentation of a study by Linz raised a genuine issue of material fact and required remand for an evidentiary hearing

Holding that a suit against the State may not be filed unless the Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board has acted on a claim or the claim "has been deemed to have been rejected by the board"

Holding that report prepared at the request and substantial participation of a company, and then subsequently distributed throughout the company, was “authorized” by that company

Adopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks

Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party

Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities

Defining "pleadings" for purposes of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure