§Why CasetextPricing

Liu et al v. the New York City Campaign Finance Board et al

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: 53 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings . . Document

56 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,626 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

  2. Johnson v. United States

    576 U.S. 591 (2015)   Cited 14,213 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding residual clause unconstitutionally vague

  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc.

    528 U.S. 167 (2000)   Cited 7,150 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing

  4. Buckley v. Valeo

    424 U.S. 1 (1976)   Cited 3,412 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a public financing law does not "abridge, restrict, or censor" expression

  5. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of Virginia

    515 U.S. 819 (1995)   Cited 1,299 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Establishment Clause does not bar disbursement of funds from student activity fees to religious organizations

  6. Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of Jacksonville

    508 U.S. 656 (1993)   Cited 1,032 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding contractors suing over the set-aside of certain state contracts based on race had standing to advance an equal protection claim because they were "able and ready" to bid on the contracts

  7. Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.

    486 U.S. 750 (1988)   Cited 1,028 times
    Holding that a statute "placing unbridled discretion in the hands of a government official or agency" is unconstitutional

  8. Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement

    505 U.S. 123 (1992)   Cited 797 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the First Amendment forbids a county from charging even a small permitting fee to offset the costs of providing security for a white-nationalist rally

  9. City of Mesquite v. Aladdin's Castle, Inc.

    455 U.S. 283 (1982)   Cited 986 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that mootness was not the necessary result when nothing in the record suggested that a city's decision to repeal challenged language in an ordinance would preclude it from reenacting the same language if the district court's judgment were vacated

  10. Thomas v. Chicago Park Dist

    534 U.S. 316 (2002)   Cited 412 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a city ordinance requiring all individuals to obtain a permit before conducting an event with more than 50 persons was a content-neutral time, place, and manner regulation of a public forum because officials were not authorized to consider or pass on the content of speech and the grounds for the denial of a permit had nothing to do with what a speaker might say

  11. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 486,730 times   688 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation

  12. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 345,805 times   922 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss