35 Cited authorities

Stern v. Marshall
564 U.S. 462 (2011) Cited 3,738 times 71 Legal Analyses
Holding that a litigant forfeited a statutory right, noting the litigant "does not explain why" the relevant "statutory limitation may not be . . . waived"
Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
458 U.S. 50 (1982) Cited 2,967 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Bankruptcy Act of 1978 was unconstitutional in part because it allowed bankruptcy courts to adjudicate state common law claims
In re Orion Pictures Corp.
4 F.3d 1095 (2d Cir. 1993) Cited 735 times 11 Legal Analyses
Holding that contract issues, where one party has not violated a specific contractual clause, may not be decided as part of a motion to assume
Telesaurus VPC, LLC v. Power
623 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 2010) Cited 403 times
Holding that a plaintiff should have leave to amend where such an amendment would not be futile
In re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc.
922 F.2d 984 (2d Cir. 1990) Cited 482 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that withdrawal of the reference is not mandatory merely because a case "involves the routine application of a non-Bankruptcy Code federal statute"
In re U.S. Lines, Inc.
197 F.3d 631 (2d Cir. 1999) Cited 318 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding a proceeding to be core because the contracts at issue "may well be the most important asset of the debtor's estate"
Bastien v. AT & T Wireless Servs., Inc.
205 F.3d 983 (7th Cir. 2000) Cited 188 times
Holding that the FCA completely preempts rate claims
City of N.Y.C. v. Exxon Corp.
932 F.2d 1020 (2d Cir. 1991) Cited 206 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that § 362(b) allowed action by city seeking reimbursement of environmental cleanup costs
In re Burger Boys, Inc.
94 F.3d 755 (2d Cir. 1996) Cited 127 times
Finding no error in district court's withdrawal of the reference even though the issue was "plainly a core bankruptcy matter" where such withdrawal enhanced judicial economy, did not delay the parties, and did not present concerns of forum shopping
Bath Petroleum Storage v. Market Hub
229 F.3d 1135 (2d Cir. 2000) Cited 84 times
Holding that Noerr-Pennington immunity is applicable to state law claims for tortious interference
Section 157 - Procedures
28 U.S.C. § 157 Cited 51,405 times 78 Legal Analyses
Determining the validity, extent, or priority of liens
Section 332 - Mobile services
47 U.S.C. § 332 Cited 1,010 times 25 Legal Analyses
Granting jurisdiction for review of any final action that is inconsistent with the TCA and simply directing the court to "hear and decide such action on an expedited basis"

LightSquared Inc. et al v. Deere & Company et al

35 Cited authorities

Holding that a litigant forfeited a statutory right, noting the litigant "does not explain why" the relevant "statutory limitation may not be . . . waived"

Holding that the Bankruptcy Act of 1978 was unconstitutional in part because it allowed bankruptcy courts to adjudicate state common law claims

Holding that contract issues, where one party has not violated a specific contractual clause, may not be decided as part of a motion to assume

Holding that a plaintiff should have leave to amend where such an amendment would not be futile

Holding that withdrawal of the reference is not mandatory merely because a case "involves the routine application of a non-Bankruptcy Code federal statute"

Holding a proceeding to be core because the contracts at issue "may well be the most important asset of the debtor's estate"

Holding that the FCA completely preempts rate claims

Holding that § 362(b) allowed action by city seeking reimbursement of environmental cleanup costs

Finding no error in district court's withdrawal of the reference even though the issue was "plainly a core bankruptcy matter" where such withdrawal enhanced judicial economy, did not delay the parties, and did not present concerns of forum shopping

Holding that Noerr-Pennington immunity is applicable to state law claims for tortious interference

Determining the validity, extent, or priority of liens

Granting jurisdiction for review of any final action that is inconsistent with the TCA and simply directing the court to "hear and decide such action on an expedited basis"