15 Cited authorities

  1. Christianson v. Colt Indus. Operating Corp.

    486 U.S. 800 (1988)   Cited 3,140 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the appeal belonged before the regional circuit because the claims did not arise under patent law
  2. Kowalski v. Tesmer

    543 U.S. 125 (2004)   Cited 704 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that attorneys lacked third party standing to assert the rights of future, as yet unascertained clients with whom “they ha[d] no relationship at all”
  3. David v. Caterpillar, Inc.

    324 F.3d 851 (7th Cir. 2003)   Cited 649 times
    Holding that liability can be based on the bias of employees who have the duty to recommend other employees for promotion, where the decision maker said he "received the necessary information" for decisions from those recommending employees
  4. Santamarina v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

    466 F.3d 570 (7th Cir. 2006)   Cited 315 times
    Holding that transferee judge was permitted to reconsider order denying remand by transferor judge
  5. Jarrard v. CDI Telecommunications, Inc.

    408 F.3d 905 (7th Cir. 2005)   Cited 117 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an appellant who "failed to develop [an argument] in the district court (or here for that matter) with citation to relevant authority or meaningful argument" forfeited the argument on appeal
  6. Methode Electronics v. Adam Technologies

    371 F.3d 923 (7th Cir. 2004)   Cited 69 times
    Holding that, when a judge proceeds under Rule 11 without a motion from the parties, a judge is without authority to award attorney fees
  7. Potter v. Janus Investment Fund

    483 F. Supp. 2d 692 (S.D. Ill. 2007)   Cited 46 times
    In Potter, Judge Herndon held that where the "gravamen" of a plaintiff s complaint is that negligence and breaches of fiduciary duty by defendants have allowed market-timing traders to engage in a pattern of market-timing trades in the shares of a mutual fund, to the detriment of long-term shareholders, the fact that the plaintiffs have chosen to characterize their claims in terms of negligence and breach of fiduciary duty under state law is not enough to avoid the preclusive effect of the Securities Litigation Act. Potter, 483 F. Supp. 2d at 702.
  8. Russell v. City of Milwaukee

    338 F.3d 662 (7th Cir. 2003)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that "the district court did not abuse its discretion under Rule 6 by enforcing the [90-day] deadline" under Rule 25 where the plaintiff did "not ma[k]e any showing or argument of excusable neglect"
  9. U.S. v. Thomas

    11 F.3d 732 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that we lacked jurisdiction to review the downward departure decision at issue because the district court had exercised its discretion
  10. Doe v. Hersemann

    155 F.R.D. 630 (N.D. Ind. 1994)   Cited 33 times
    Holding that FED. R. CIV. P. 45 permits service of a subpoena by certified mail
  11. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,233 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system
  12. Rule 45 - Subpoena

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 45   Cited 16,712 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"
  13. Section 1927 - Counsel's liability for excessive costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1927   Cited 8,859 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts the power to charge "excess costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees reasonably incurred" due to "unreasonabl[e] and vexatious" conduct