8 Cited authorities

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (2009) Cited 252,709 times 279 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
Papasan v. Allain
478 U.S. 265 (1986) Cited 16,680 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that Ex parte Young would not support a suit against a state for ongoing liability for an alleged past breach of trust, since "continuing payment of the income from the lost corpus is essentially equivalent in economic terms to a one-time restoration of the lost corpus itself"
McGlinchy v. Shell Chemical Co.
845 F.2d 802 (9th Cir. 1988) Cited 1,058 times
Holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs leave to file a second amended complaint adding causes of action where it had failed to cure deficiencies in prior amended complaints
Buckey v. County of Los Angeles
968 F.2d 791 (9th Cir. 1992) Cited 592 times
Ruling that leave to amend after Rule 12(b) dismissal is appropriate only if there is a distinct, cognizable claim that could be stated, consistent with the facts and allegations set forth in the complaint
Gulf Contracting, Inc. v. U.S.
506 U.S. 999 (1992) Cited 112 times
Holding that under Feldman (9th Cir. 1992), lower courts may not review a specific state court decision interpreting a state court rule
Berg v. Dept. of Social Services
694 P.2d 1291 (Colo. App. 1984)
No. 84CA0034 Decided December 13, 1984. Appeal from the District Court of the City and County of Denver Honorable Roger Cisneros, Judge Gunther Westlund, P.C., Roger W. Westlund, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Duane Woodard, Attorney General, Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Richard H. Forman, Solicitor General, Joyce K. Herr, Assistant Attorney General, for Defendants-Appellees. Division I. Opinion by JUDGE PIERCE. This case arises from the denial of Medicaid claims submitted by Dr. Dalrie
Section 1396a - State plans for medical assistance
42 U.S.C. § 1396a Cited 3,537 times 39 Legal Analyses
Concluding paragraph, exception
Section 447.45 - Timely claims payment
42 C.F.R. § 447.45 Cited 47 times
Calculating agency payment time limits from "the date the agency receives the claim"

Lifestream Complete Senior Living Incorporated et al v. Arizona Healthcare Cost Containment System et al

8 Cited authorities

Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

Holding that Ex parte Young would not support a suit against a state for ongoing liability for an alleged past breach of trust, since "continuing payment of the income from the lost corpus is essentially equivalent in economic terms to a one-time restoration of the lost corpus itself"

Holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs leave to file a second amended complaint adding causes of action where it had failed to cure deficiencies in prior amended complaints

Ruling that leave to amend after Rule 12(b) dismissal is appropriate only if there is a distinct, cognizable claim that could be stated, consistent with the facts and allegations set forth in the complaint

Holding that under Feldman (9th Cir. 1992), lower courts may not review a specific state court decision interpreting a state court rule

Concluding paragraph, exception

Calculating agency payment time limits from "the date the agency receives the claim"