Brooks v. Gaenzle
614 F.3d 1213 (10th Cir. 2010) Cited 431 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that "Colorado law recognizes 'if a plaintiff asserts all of his or her claims, including state law claims, in federal court, and the federal court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction [over the state claims], the plaintiff may refile those claims in state court'"
Bauchman v. West High School
132 F.3d 542 (10th Cir. 1997) Cited 479 timesHolding that the case or controversy requirement was not met because the plaintiff's requested declaratory relief was moot
Nicolow v. Hewlett Packard Co.
No. 13- 00301 CRB (N.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2013) Cited 14 timesDeclining to appoint an executive committee
Horn v. Raines
227 F.R.D. 1 (D.D.C. 2005) Cited 21 timesAdopting Congress' reasoning underlying the PSLRA's preference for institutional investors in the context of a derivative action
MacAlister v. Guterma
263 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1958) Cited 87 timesHolding that Rule 42, F.R. Civ. P. allows consolidation not only for trial purposes but also in pretrial stages
Clark ex rel. DaVita, Inc. v. Thiry
Civil Action No. 12-cv-2074-WJM-CBS (D. Colo. Jan. 7, 2014) Cited 2 timesCivil Action No. 12-cv-2074-WJM-CBS Civil Action No. 13-cv-1308-WJM-MJW 01-07-2014 COURTNEY CLARK, Derivatively on Behalf of DaVita, Inc., Plaintiff, v. KENT J. THIRY, PAMELA M. ARWAY, CHARLES G. BERG, WILLARD W. BRITTAIN, JR., CAROL ANTHONY DAVIDSON, PAUL J. DIAZ, PETER T. GRAUER, JOHN M. NEHRA, WILLIAM L. ROPER, DAVID T. SHAPIRO, and ROGER J. VALINE, Defendants, DAVITA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Nominal Defendant. and HAVERHILL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Derivatively on Behalf of DaVita HealthCare
Marquez v. Harvest Standard, LLC
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02584-PAB-MJW (D. Colo. May. 9, 2011) Cited 3 timesCivil Action No. 09-cv-02584-PAB-MJW. May 9, 2011 ORDER PHILIP BRIMMER, District Judge This matter is before the Court sua sponte. In her second amended complaint [Docket No. 28], plaintiff brought false arrest, malicious prosecution, and excessive bond claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Brian Norton and Boyd Wheelwright, over which the Court exercised original jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. On October 29, 2010, the Court granted summary judgment to defendants Norton
Rule 42 - Consolidation; Separate Trials
Fed. R. Civ. P. 42 Cited 9,244 times 24 Legal AnalysesGranting court's authority to consolidate related cases or "issue any other orders to avoid unnecessary cost or delay."