16 Cited authorities

Callie v. Near
829 F.2d 888 (9th Cir. 1987) Cited 462 times
Holding that for a settlement to be enforceable, the parties must have "had a meeting of the minds regarding" its terms
Getz v. the Boeing Co.
654 F.3d 852 (9th Cir. 2011) Cited 201 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that certification after careful scrutiny is "sufficient proof of conformity"
Synthes v. G.M. Dos Reis Jr. Ind. Com. De Equip. Medico
563 F.3d 1285 (Fed. Cir. 2009) Cited 199 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding display of products at a trade show after the patent's issuance and "for the purpose of generating interest in infringing products" was a relevant jurisdictional contact
ISI International, Inc. v. Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
256 F.3d 548 (7th Cir. 2001) Cited 235 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding jurisdiction under Rule 4(k) even though parties failed to raise it as a basis for personal jurisdiction
Adams v. Unione Mediterranea Di Sicurta
364 F.3d 646 (5th Cir. 2004) Cited 157 times
Finding sufficient contacts for personal jurisdiction where foreign defendant insured steel shipment to United States and "enabled prosecution of claims in the United States by providing claims agents and surveyors" in United States
U.S. v. Swiss Am. Bank
191 F.3d 30 (1st Cir. 1999) Cited 162 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that consideration of summary judgment motion should await determination of jurisdiction
World Tanker Carriers Corp. v. MV Ya Mawlaya
99 F.3d 717 (5th Cir. 1996) Cited 105 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that cases of admiralty arise under federal law for purposes of Rule 4(k)
Harrop v. Western Airlines, Inc.
550 F.2d 1143 (9th Cir. 1977) Cited 126 times
Holding that it was not an abuse of discretion for a court to enforce a settlement agreement after the parties entered the material terms of the agreement on the record
TNT Marketing, Inc. v. Agresti
796 F.2d 276 (9th Cir. 1986) Cited 72 times
Recognizing the Court's "inherent power to enforce [an] agreement in settlement of litigation before it"
Marks-Foreman v. Reporter Pub. Co.
12 F. Supp. 2d 1089 (S.D. Cal. 1998) Cited 20 times
No. 97-CIV-0675-B (RBB). July 10, 1998. Lorene Marks-Foreman, San Diego, CA, in pro per. Betty R. Quarles, Monterey Park, CA, for defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BREWSTER, District Judge. I. Introduction A. Background Lorene Marks-Foreman ("Plaintiff"), proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The First Amended Complaint ("FAC") alleged that State Compensation Insurance Fund ("SCIF") and Reporter Publishing Company
Rule 4 - Summons
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 Cited 74,415 times 131 Legal Analyses
Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
Section 1391 - Venue generally
28 U.S.C. § 1391 Cited 29,448 times 201 Legal Analyses
Finding that venue lies where a "substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim" occurred
Section 1338 - Patents, plant variety protection, copyrights, mask works, designs, trademarks, and unfair competition
28 U.S.C. § 1338 Cited 5,530 times 71 Legal Analyses
Granting exclusive jurisdiction to the district courts "of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, . . . copyrights and trademarks"

Liberty Media Holdings LLC v. FF Magnat Limited et al

16 Cited authorities

Holding that for a settlement to be enforceable, the parties must have "had a meeting of the minds regarding" its terms

Holding that certification after careful scrutiny is "sufficient proof of conformity"

Holding display of products at a trade show after the patent's issuance and "for the purpose of generating interest in infringing products" was a relevant jurisdictional contact

Finding jurisdiction under Rule 4(k) even though parties failed to raise it as a basis for personal jurisdiction

Finding sufficient contacts for personal jurisdiction where foreign defendant insured steel shipment to United States and "enabled prosecution of claims in the United States by providing claims agents and surveyors" in United States

Holding that consideration of summary judgment motion should await determination of jurisdiction

Holding that cases of admiralty arise under federal law for purposes of Rule 4(k)

Holding that it was not an abuse of discretion for a court to enforce a settlement agreement after the parties entered the material terms of the agreement on the record

Recognizing the Court's "inherent power to enforce [an] agreement in settlement of litigation before it"

Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

Finding that venue lies where a "substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim" occurred

Granting exclusive jurisdiction to the district courts "of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, . . . copyrights and trademarks"