10 Cited authorities

  1. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.

    555 U.S. 7 (2008)   Cited 16,916 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff must establish "that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm"
  2. Mazurek v. Armstrong

    520 U.S. 968 (1997)   Cited 3,380 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief has a "requirement for substantial proof is much higher" than a defendant's summary judgment motion
  3. Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington

    326 U.S. 310 (1945)   Cited 22,689 times   109 Legal Analyses
    Holding that states may exercise personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants with "certain minimum contacts with [the forum] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice’ " (quoting Milliken v. Meyer , 311 U.S. 457, 463, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85 L.Ed. 278 (1940) )
  4. Zepeda v. United States I.N.S.

    753 F.2d 719 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 1,386 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal courts may not enjoin parties it lacks personal jurisdiction over, nor attempt to determine the rights of persons not before the court
  5. Dish Network Corp.. v. Fed. Communications Comm'n

    653 F.3d 771 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 132 times
    Holding that a plaintiff seeking preliminary injunction "must demonstrate that it meets all four of the elements of the preliminary injunction test"
  6. Hitchman Coal Coke Co. v. Mitchell

    245 U.S. 229 (1917)   Cited 461 times
    In Hitchman Coal Coke Co. v. Mitchell, 245 U.S. 229, 262 (1917), this Court struck the portions of a decree enjoining a union from picketing and physical violence because there was no evidence that either of these forms of interference was threatened.
  7. Faile v. Hope

    24 F.3d 245 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 3 times

    24 F.3d 245 (9th Cir. 1994) Brian S. FAILE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael HOPE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-16328. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit April 14, 1994 Submitted April 5, 1994. Editorial Note: This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions) Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, No. CV-90-00345-PMP; Philip

  8. Mayview Corp. v. Rodstein

    480 F.2d 714 (9th Cir. 1973)   Cited 18 times
    Holding "[b]ecause of the disputed facts, the matter should proceed to trial on the merits" and preliminary injunction was improper
  9. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 348,310 times   930 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  10. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,245 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system