570 U.S. 693 (2013) Cited 947 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that proponents of a ballot initiative who "ha[d] no role ... in the enforcement of " the initiative and were not "agents of the State" lacked standing to defend it on appeal
Holding that although "some form of heightened scrutiny would be appropriate," strict scrutiny was not necessary, and instead applying intermediate scrutiny
Holding that a New York regulation restricting applications for handgun licenses to nonresidents with a primary place of business in the State did not violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause because the "discrimination [was] sufficiently justified by New York's public safety interest in monitoring handgun licensees" and its inability to access sufficient information about the qualifications of nonresidents