14 Cited authorities

Septembertide Pub., B.V. v. Stein Day, Inc.
884 F.2d 675 (2d Cir. 1989) Cited 257 times
Holding author was third-party beneficiary of contract between publisher and sublicensee of publishing rights, where publisher paid author two-thirds of all sublicensing income derived from contract — pursuant to separate agreement — and contract referred to author and his work
Weininger v. Castro
462 F. Supp. 2d 457 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) Cited 85 times
Holding that the TRIA "provides [an] independent basis of subject matter jurisdiction in this enforcement proceeding against these [foreign sovereign] entities"
Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC v. Bank of China
192 F. Supp. 2d 173 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) Cited 58 times
Holding that interpleader was appropriate where the plaintiff "was faced with multiple claims against the same pool of assets that were real and not fancied"
Hausler v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
845 F. Supp. 2d 553 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) Cited 24 times
Holding that TRIA represents "Congress's recognition that federal law must provide the substantive rules governing the recovery of terrorism related judgments"
Levin v. Bank of New York
09 CV 5900 (RPP) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2011) Cited 21 times
Determining that under New York's separate entity rule, "service of a writ of attachment on the Bank of New York's Maryland branch is not sufficient to attach assets residing in accounts in New York State."
Calderon-Cardona v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
867 F. Supp. 2d 389 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) Cited 19 times
Ruling on the question of whether EFTs were attachable before providing notice to potentially interested third parties
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. ESM Fund I, LP
785 F. Supp. 2d 188 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) Cited 14 times
Recognizing that the Prospectus Supplement, filed with the SEC, is "important" and "persuasive evidence" of the intent of the PSA
Landmark Chemicals, Sa. v. Merrill Lynch & Co.
234 F.R.D. 62 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) Cited 12 times
Involving claim for attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to Rule 22
A/S Krediit Pank v. Chase Manhattan Bank
303 F.2d 648 (2d Cir. 1962) Cited 25 times
No. 353, Docket 27308. Argued May 2, 1962. Decided May 18, 1962. Delson, Levin Gordon, New York City (J. Pinckney Torpats, Arlington, Va., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant. A. Donald MacKinnon and Milbank, Tweed, Hope Hadley, New York City (Rebecca M. Cutler, Edward J. Reilly, Jr., New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, WATERMAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Appellant, an Estonian bank, brought an action in the District Court for the Southern
Section 1335 - Interpleader
28 U.S.C. § 1335 Cited 2,276 times 5 Legal Analyses
Granting original jurisdiction to the district courts in "any civil action of interpleader or in the nature of interpleader" "if two or more adverse claimants . . . are claiming or may claim to be entitled to such money or property" as shall have been pleaded into court
Rule 22 - Interpleader
Fed. R. Civ. P. 22 Cited 1,378 times 4 Legal Analyses
Governing interpleader
Section 1608 - Service; time to answer; default
28 U.S.C. § 1608 Cited 969 times 5 Legal Analyses
Authorizing service "through diplomatic channels"
Section 2361 - Process and procedure
28 U.S.C. § 2361 Cited 745 times 4 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that the “district court . . . may discharge the plaintiff from further liability”
Section 134 - Repayment of deposits standing in the names of minors, trustees or joint depositors; repayment where adverse claim is asserted; interpleader in certain actions; effect of claims or advices originating in, and statutes, rules or regulations purporting to be in force in occupied territories
N.Y. Banking Law § 134 Cited 38 times
1. Any minor may endorse a check payable to his order for the purpose of depositing the proceeds in a deposit in his name and when any deposit shall be made by or in the name of any minor, the same shall be held for the exclusive right and benefit of such minor, and free from the control or lien of all other persons, except creditors, and shall be paid, together with the interest thereon to the person or upon the order by check or otherwise of the person in whose name the deposit shall stand, and

Levin et al v. Bank of New York et al

14 Cited authorities

Holding author was third-party beneficiary of contract between publisher and sublicensee of publishing rights, where publisher paid author two-thirds of all sublicensing income derived from contract — pursuant to separate agreement — and contract referred to author and his work

Holding that the TRIA "provides [an] independent basis of subject matter jurisdiction in this enforcement proceeding against these [foreign sovereign] entities"

Holding that interpleader was appropriate where the plaintiff "was faced with multiple claims against the same pool of assets that were real and not fancied"

Holding that TRIA represents "Congress's recognition that federal law must provide the substantive rules governing the recovery of terrorism related judgments"

Determining that under New York's separate entity rule, "service of a writ of attachment on the Bank of New York's Maryland branch is not sufficient to attach assets residing in accounts in New York State."

Ruling on the question of whether EFTs were attachable before providing notice to potentially interested third parties

Recognizing that the Prospectus Supplement, filed with the SEC, is "important" and "persuasive evidence" of the intent of the PSA

Involving claim for attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to Rule 22

Granting original jurisdiction to the district courts in "any civil action of interpleader or in the nature of interpleader" "if two or more adverse claimants . . . are claiming or may claim to be entitled to such money or property" as shall have been pleaded into court

Governing interpleader

Authorizing service "through diplomatic channels"

Recognizing that the “district court . . . may discharge the plaintiff from further liability”