§Why CasetextPricing

Levin et al v. Bank of New York et al

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 394 CROSS MOTION to Discharge.CROSS MOTION for Attorney Fees.. Document

8 Cited authorities

  1. Septembertide Pub., B.V. v. Stein Day, Inc.

    884 F.2d 675 (2d Cir. 1989)   Cited 257 times
    Holding author was third-party beneficiary of contract between publisher and sublicensee of publishing rights, where publisher paid author two-thirds of all sublicensing income derived from contract — pursuant to separate agreement — and contract referred to author and his work

  2. Weininger v. Castro

    462 F. Supp. 2d 457 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)   Cited 85 times
    Holding that the TRIA "provides [an] independent basis of subject matter jurisdiction in this enforcement proceeding against these [foreign sovereign] entities"

  3. Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC v. Bank of China

    192 F. Supp. 2d 173 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that interpleader was appropriate where the plaintiff "was faced with multiple claims against the same pool of assets that were real and not fancied"

  4. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Kraft

    200 F.2d 952 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 77 times
    Holding that "[t]he stakeholder should not be obliged at its peril to determine which of two claimants has the better claim"

  5. A/S Krediit Pank v. Chase Manhattan Bank

    303 F.2d 648 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 25 times

    No. 353, Docket 27308. Argued May 2, 1962. Decided May 18, 1962. Delson, Levin Gordon, New York City (J. Pinckney Torpats, Arlington, Va., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant. A. Donald MacKinnon and Milbank, Tweed, Hope Hadley, New York City (Rebecca M. Cutler, Edward J. Reilly, Jr., New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, WATERMAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Appellant, an Estonian bank, brought an action in the District Court for the Southern

  6. Section 1335 - Interpleader

    28 U.S.C. § 1335   Cited 2,263 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Granting original jurisdiction to the district courts in "any civil action of interpleader or in the nature of interpleader" "if two or more adverse claimants . . . are claiming or may claim to be entitled to such money or property" as shall have been pleaded into court

  7. Section 2361 - Process and procedure

    28 U.S.C. § 2361   Cited 740 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that the “district court . . . may discharge the plaintiff from further liability”

  8. Section 134 - Repayment of deposits standing in the names of minors, trustees or joint depositors; repayment where adverse claim is asserted; interpleader in certain actions; effect of claims or advices originating in, and statutes, rules or regulations purporting to be in force in occupied territories

    N.Y. Banking Law § 134   Cited 38 times

    1. Any minor may endorse a check payable to his order for the purpose of depositing the proceeds in a deposit in his name and when any deposit shall be made by or in the name of any minor, the same shall be held for the exclusive right and benefit of such minor, and free from the control or lien of all other persons, except creditors, and shall be paid, together with the interest thereon to the person or upon the order by check or otherwise of the person in whose name the deposit shall stand, and