§Why CasetextPricing

Leopold v. Department of Justice

REPLY to opposition to motion re Cross MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment

4 Cited authorities

  1. Ollman v. Evans

    750 F.2d 970 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 367 times
    Adopting "totality of the circumstances" approach to the fact-opinion issue

  2. American Civil Liberties Union v. United States Department of Justice

    321 F. Supp. 2d 24 (D.D.C. 2004)   Cited 24 times
    Finding exigency because of the "ongoing debate regarding the renewal and/or amendment of the Patriot Act"

  3. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,453 times   561 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party

  4. Section 16.5 - Timing of responses to requests

    28 C.F.R. § 16.5   Cited 46 times
    Regarding timing of responses to requests and permitting multitrack processing