§Why CasetextPricing

Leonel & Noel Corp. v. Central Beer Import & Export, Inc.

MOTION

39 Cited authorities

  1. Hendrickson v. Cooper

    589 F.3d 887 (7th Cir. 2009)   Cited 525 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an inmate's constitutional rights are violated where prison guards use physical force when the inmate poses no threat

  2. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. AIC Security Investigations, Ltd.

    55 F.3d 1276 (7th Cir. 1995)   Cited 651 times
    Holding that individuals who do not otherwise meet the statutory definition of employer cannot be held liable under the ADA

  3. Jennings v. Jones

    587 F.3d 430 (1st Cir. 2009)   Cited 110 times
    Finding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering a new trial after it weighed the testimony of the two witnesses who claimed to have observed the incident against the objective evidence (a videotape of the incident) and found that in light of the contradictions between the two the witnesses were not credible

  4. Gile v. United Airlines, Inc.

    213 F.3d 365 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 134 times
    Holding that an employer has “an affirmative obligation” to “seek [the employee] out and work with her to craft a reasonable accommodation”

  5. Loitz v. Remington Arms Co.

    138 Ill. 2d 404 (Ill. 1990)   Cited 169 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reversing award of punitive damages where 94 prior accidents reflected about 0.003% of production and "even smaller percentage" of uses (gun)

  6. Wallace v. McGlothan

    606 F.3d 410 (7th Cir. 2010)   Cited 88 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that party waived an argument by failing to raise it in opposition to Rule 50(b) motion

  7. King v. Harrington

    447 F.3d 531 (7th Cir. 2006)   Cited 90 times
    Holding that failure to object to redactions waives appellate review

  8. Bankcard America v. Universal Bancard Systems

    203 F.3d 477 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 95 times
    Finding error harmless where three unadmitted documents sent to jury room duplicated extensive trial testimony and opposing party had thoroughly presented its side of the issue

  9. Eiland v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.

    58 F.3d 176 (5th Cir. 1995)   Cited 105 times
    Holding that "admission or exclusion of expert testimony is a matter left to the discretion of the trial court, and that decision will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is manifestly erroneous"

  10. Schobert v. Illinois Dept. of Transp

    304 F.3d 725 (7th Cir. 2002)   Cited 82 times
    Holding that the "objection must be specific enough that the nature of the error is brought into focus" and that "pragmatically speaking the district court must be made aware of the error prior to instructing the jury"

  11. Rule 59 - New Trial; Altering or Amending a Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 59   Cited 44,280 times   68 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a motion to alter or amend judgment must be filed within 28 days after entry of judgment

  12. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

  13. Rule 50 - Judgment as a Matter of Law in a Jury Trial; Related Motion for a New Trial; Conditional Ruling

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 50   Cited 13,789 times   63 Legal Analyses
    Allowing "renewed motion"

  14. Section 1333.82 - Alcoholic beverages franchise definitions

    Ohio Rev. Code § 1333.82   Cited 45 times
    Defining distributor as "any person who sells or distributes alcoholic beverages to retail permit holders in this state"

  15. Section 1333.84 - Prohibited acts

    Ohio Rev. Code § 1333.84   Cited 16 times

    Notwithstanding the terms of any franchise, no manufacturer or distributor engaged in the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages, or a subsidiary of any such manufacturer, shall: (A) Fail to act in good faith or without just cause in acting or purporting to act under the terms of a franchise or in cancelling or failing to renew a franchise; (B) Award an additional franchise for the sale of the same brand within the same sales area or territory. No franchise prohibits a retail permit holder

  16. Section 325B.01 - DEFINITIONS

    Minn. Stat. § 325B.01   Cited 3 times

    Subdivision 1.Scope. As used in sections 325B.01 to 325B.17 and unless otherwise required by the context, the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2.Agreement. "Agreement" means one or more of the following: (a) a commercial relationship between a beer wholesaler and a brewer of a definite or indefinite duration, which is not required to be evidenced in writing; (b) a relationship whereby the beer wholesaler is granted the right to offer and sell a brand or brands of

  17. Section 35-8A-2 - Definitions of terms

    S.D. Codified Laws § 35-8A-2

    Terms used in this chapter mean: (1) "Agreement," any commercial relationship between a wholesaler and a supplier of a definite duration or indefinite duration, whether written or oral, whereby the wholesaler is granted by the supplier the right to offer and sell the supplier's brands of malt beverages; (2) "Ancillary business," any business owned by a wholesaler, a controlling stockholder of a wholesaler, or a controlling partner of a wholesaler, the assets of which are primarily used in transporting

  18. Section 5-04-01 - Definitions

    N.D. Cent. Code § 5-04-01

    As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires: 1. "Agreement" means one or more of the following: a. A commercial relationship between a licensed beer wholesaler and a licensed brewer of a definite or indefinite duration which is not required to be evidenced in writing. b. A relationship whereby the beer wholesaler is granted the right to offer and sell a brand or brands of beer offered by a brewer. c. A relationship whereby the beer wholesaler, as an independent business, constitutes

  19. Section 815 ILCS 720/1

    815 ILCS 720/1   Cited 10 times

    This Act shall be known and may be cited as the "Beer Industry Fair Dealing Act". 815 ILCS 720/1 P.A. 82-946.

  20. Section 815 ILCS 720/1.1

    815 ILCS 720/1.1   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses

    As used in this Act: (1) "Beer" means a beverage obtained by the alcoholic fermentation of an infusion or concoction of barley, or other grain, malt, and hops in water, and includes, among other things, beer, ale, stout, lager beer, porter, all beverages brewed or fermented wholly or in part from malt products, and the like; and for purposes of this Act only, the term "beer" shall also include malt beverage products containing less than one-half of 1% of alcohol by volume and marketed for adult consumption