§Why CasetextPricing

Lelchook et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran et al

RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER

15 Cited authorities

  1. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank SAL

    732 F.3d 161 (2d Cir. 2013)   Cited 523 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, while the "mere maintenance" of a bank account in the United States is insufficient, the use of a bank account "as an instrument to achieve the very wrong alleged" is sufficient to establish minimum contacts

  2. Boit v. Gar-Tec Prods., Inc.

    967 F.2d 671 (1st Cir. 1992)   Cited 510 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Asahi did not undermine an earlier First Circuit decision that limited the stream of commerce theory

  3. Call of the Wild Movie, LLC v. Does 1-1,062

    770 F. Supp. 2d 332 (D.D.C. 2011)   Cited 177 times
    Holding that nonparty's filing of motion to quash did not waive jurisdictional objection

  4. U.S. v. Swiss Am. Bank

    191 F.3d 30 (1st Cir. 1999)   Cited 161 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that consideration of summary judgment motion should await determination of jurisdiction

  5. London-Sire Records, Inc. v. Doe 1

    542 F. Supp. 2d 153 (D. Mass. 2008)   Cited 88 times
    Holding that the segment of a hard disc on which an electronic music file is encoded is a "phonorecord" under the Copyright Act

  6. Gucci America, Inc. v. Weixing Li

    135 F. Supp. 3d 87 (S.D.N.Y. 2015)   Cited 34 times
    Finding jurisdiction under the state long-arm statute where a defendant foreign bank maintained a correspondent account in the forum state

  7. U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Wilson

    27 F. Supp. 3d 517 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that New York court could exercise personal jurisdiction over defendants because defendants executed trades on New York-based exchange and clearinghouse

  8. Weiss v. National Westminster Bank PLC

    176 F. Supp. 3d 264 (E.D.N.Y. 2016)   Cited 14 times
    Finding personal jurisdiction over a bank proper when transfers routed through a bank "overlapped with the attacks ... that caused Plaintiffs’ injuries, but also occurred at a time when Defendant allegedly knew that funds it transferred ... were being used to support a terrorist organization"

  9. Neelon v. Krueger

    Civil Action No. 12-cv-11198-IT (D. Mass. Jul. 30, 2015)

    Civil Action No. 12-cv-11198-IT 07-30-2015 DANIEL P. NEELON, Plaintiff, v. BLAIR KRUEGER and DESERT EAGLE RESOURCES, LTD. f/k/a GARRISON INTERNATIONAL, LTD., Defendants. TALWANI, D.J. MEMORANDUM & ORDER I. Introduction Plaintiff Daniel P. Neelon ("Neelon"), a Massachusetts attorney, brings claims alleging that he was harmed by public statements made in Canada by Defendants about events occurring in Mongolia. In broad strokes, the factual allegations are as follows. In order to finance mining exploration

  10. Marks v. Andersen Windows, Inc.

    No. 14-cv-10171-LTS (D. Mass. Jun. 4, 2014)

    No. 14-cv-10171-LTS 06-04-2014 ALAN MARKS et al., Plaintiffs, v. ANDERSEN WINDOWS, INC. et al., Defendants. Leo T. Sorokin ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE OF COURT TO CONDUCT JURISDICTIONAL DISCOVERY (DOC. NO. 36) SOROKIN, C.M.J. The plaintiffs, purporting to represent classes of similarly situated individuals from Massachusetts and Indiana, have sued two defendant corporations for breach of contract and related claims arising from alleged defects in windows installed in their homes. See generally

  11. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 70,485 times   126 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

  12. Section 1407 - Multidistrict litigation

    28 U.S.C. § 1407   Cited 7,080 times   105 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing consolidation of pretrial proceedings for related cases filed in multiple federal districts