§Why CasetextPricing

Chandler v. Williams et al

Memorandum in opposition to re MOTION to Hold in Abeyance

5 Cited authorities

  1. McNeil v. United States

    508 U.S. 106 (1993)   Cited 6,881 times
    Holding that an action must be dismissed when statutory exhaustion requirement was not met until after action was filed

  2. Duplan v. Harper

    188 F.3d 1195 (10th Cir. 1999)   Cited 193 times
    Holding an amended complaint doesn't cure an exhaustion defect

  3. Schneider v. Kissinger

    Civil Action No. 01-1902 (RMC) (D.D.C. Mar. 30, 2004)   Cited 45 times
    Holding that it was necessary for plaintiff to complete the administrative process before coming to court

  4. Ficken v. Rice

    Civil Action: 04-1132 (RMU), Document Nos. 12, 23 (D.D.C. Jan. 17, 2006)   Cited 4 times
    Dismissing claims seeking damages based on violation of the U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights because "[t]hough the U.N. Declaration may be considered evidence of customary international law, it is not legally binding or self-executing"

  5. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,441 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"