§Why CasetextPricing

Opposition_defendants_opposition_to_plaintiffs_motion_to_strike_and_tax_costs

Motion

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nelson v. Anderson

    72 Cal.App.4th 111 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 287 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding that obligations violated by limiting plaintiff's role were owed to the corporation because the decisions "amount[ed] to alleged misfeasance or negligence in managing the corporation's business, causing the business to be a total failure"

  2. Ginns v. Savage

    61 Cal.2d 520 (Cal. 1964)   Cited 308 times
    In Ginns v. Savage (1964) 61 Cal.2d 520, 39 Cal.Rptr. 377, 393 P.2d 689, the Real Estate Commissioner (commissioner), after notice and a hearing, revoked the plaintiff's license as a real estate broker.

  3. Seever v. Copley Press, Inc.

    141 Cal.App.4th 1550 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 88 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Concluding "the trial court was well within its discretion in awarding travel costs to depositions"

  4. Palmer v. GTE California, Inc.

    30 Cal.4th 1265 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 89 times
    In Palmer, our Supreme Court confirmed that "[t]he written notice of entry of judgment served on the party who moves for a new trial need not, for the purposes of [sections 659 and 660 ], be a separate document entitled ‘notice of entry of judgment.’ "

  5. Droeger v. Friedman, Sloan Ross

    54 Cal.3d 26 (Cal. 1991)   Cited 98 times
    In Droeger v. Friedman, Sloan Ross, supra, 54 Cal.3d 26, after husband and wife had separated, wife encumbered two parcels of community real property with deeds of trust in order to secure repayment of attorney fees incurred during the dissolution proceedings.

  6. Westrec Marina Management, Inc. v. Jardine Ins. Brokers Orange County, Inc.

    85 Cal.App.4th 1042 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 38 times
    Upholding the exclusion of expert testimony due in part to substantive law of lost profits

  7. Gibson v. Bobroff

    49 Cal.App.4th 1202 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that the "legislation does not foreclose an award of mediation expenses as costs" and that "when an unsuccessful mediation has been court ordered, reasonably necessary expenses incident thereto may, in the sound discretion of the trial court, be awarded after trial to a prevailing party"

  8. California State Auto. Ass'n Inter-Ins. Bureau v. Warwick

    17 Cal.3d 190 (Cal. 1976)   Cited 50 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Warwick, the court observed that subdivision (c) of section 11580.1 of the Insurance Code authorizes insurance carriers to exclude "`... Liability for bodily injury to an insured.'"

  9. Burnsed v. State Bd. of Control

    189 Cal.App.3d 213 (Cal. Ct. App. 1987)   Cited 27 times

    Docket No. 26330. January 15, 1987. Appeal from Superior Court of Sacramento County, No. 335974, Ronald B. Robie, Judge. Assigned by the Chairperson of the Judicial Council. COUNSEL John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, N. Eugene Hill, Assistant Attorney General, and Paul H. Dobson, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Appellant. Daniel Robert Lang and Craig A. Paul for Plaintiff and Respondent. OPINION EVANS, Acting P.J. This is an appeal by the California State Board of Control (Board) from

  10. Estate of Wyman

    208 Cal.App.2d 489 (Cal. Ct. App. 1962)   Cited 11 times
    Noting that objections to an inheritance tax appraiser's report were overruled and the report was approved by the superior court

  11. Section 664.5 - Contested action or special proceeding in which prevailing party not represented by counsel

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 664.5   Cited 199 times

    (a) In any contested action or special proceeding other than a small claims action or an action or proceeding in which a prevailing party is not represented by counsel, the party submitting an order or judgment for entry shall prepare and serve, a copy of the notice of entry of judgment to all parties who have appeared in the action or proceeding and shall file with the court the original notice of entry of judgment together with the proof of service. This subdivision does not apply in a proceeding

  12. Rule 3.1700 - Prejudgment costs

    Cal. R. 3.1700   Cited 278 times

    (a) Claiming costs (1)Trial costs A prevailing party who claims costs must serve and file a memorandum of costs within 15 days after the date of service of the notice of entry of judgment or dismissal by the clerk under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.5 or the date of service of written notice of entry of judgment or dismissal, or within 180 days after entry of judgment, whichever is first. The memorandum of costs must be verified by a statement of the party, attorney, or agent that to the best