2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 2343 (N.Y. 2012) Cited 984 times
Holding that "[t]o the extent that these claims succeed, the unjust enrichment claim is duplicative; if plaintiffs' other claims are defective, an unjust enrichment claim cannot remedy the defects"
Holding agent did not intend to be personally bound to the contract when he "only signed the contract once, rather than signing twice, which is the general practice when an individual wishes to be personally bound"
167 Cal.App.4th 333 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) Cited 221 times
Holding that a three-year statute of limitations applies to an unjust enrichment cause of action based on fraud or mistake, pursuant to § 338 of the California Code of Civil Procedure
Holding that defendant would be estopped from raising statute-of-limitations defense if plaintiff proved that he "reasonably relied" on defendant's misrepresentation
Holding that there was no reputational injury in fact because the individual injuries are not adequately explained, for example by attached affidavits or declarations that state and describe how the subjects reputation was harmed
Holding delay of years, the passing away of elderly potential plaintiffs, and a loss of efficiency were not obstacles sufficient to impede or impair intervenors' ability to protect their interests
Limiting the limitations period for causes of action accruing outside of New York where the foreign jurisdiction imposes a shorter statute of limitations than the state does