§Why CasetextPricing

Laydon v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd. et al

REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 278 MOTION for Reargument or Reconsideration. . Document

4 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 252,784 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 266,697 times   365 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

  3. DiVittorio v. Equidyne Extractive Industries

    822 F.2d 1242 (2d Cir. 1987)   Cited 828 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where "plaintiff's counsel declared his intention to stand on the allegations of his complaint," plaintiff "irrevocably waived the option offered by the district court further to amend his complaint"

  4. In re Ddavp Direct Purchaser

    585 F.3d 677 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 224 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Finding an injury had been alleged where "the plaintiffs are purchasers of the defendants' product who allege being forced to pay supra-competitive prices as a result of the defendants' anticompetitive conduct"