6 Cited authorities

Foman v. Davis
371 U.S. 178 (1962) Cited 29,223 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an appeal was improperly dismissed when the record as a whole — including a timely but incomplete notice of appeal and a premature but complete notice — revealed the orders petitioner sought to appeal
Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corp.
503 U.S. 258 (1992) Cited 1,683 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) could not recover under RICO for stock-manipulation scheme that bankrupted broker-dealers, triggering a statutory requirement that SIPC meet the broker-dealers' obligations to their customers
Oliver Schools, Inc. v. Foley
930 F.2d 248 (2d Cir. 1991) Cited 159 times
Finding that "the qualified immunity hurdle . . . is not a valid basis for denying leave to amend the complaint," even though the plaintiff might "ultimately be unable to prevail because of that defense."
Rule 4 - Summons
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 Cited 71,368 times 127 Legal Analyses
Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
Section 1964 - Civil remedies
18 U.S.C. § 1964 Cited 6,159 times 42 Legal Analyses
Granting civil remedies for RICO violation
Section 302 - Personal jurisdiction by acts of non-domiciliaries
N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 302 Cited 4,286 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that service may be made "to a person of suitable age and discretion at the actual place of business, dwelling place or usual place of abode of the person to be served and by ... mailing the summons to the person to be served at his or her last known residence"

Lawson v. Full Tilt Poker Ltd. et al

6 Cited authorities

Foman v. Davis

Holding that an appeal was improperly dismissed when the record as a whole — including a timely but incomplete notice of appeal and a premature but complete notice — revealed the orders petitioner sought to appeal

Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corp.

Holding that the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) could not recover under RICO for stock-manipulation scheme that bankrupted broker-dealers, triggering a statutory requirement that SIPC meet the broker-dealers' obligations to their customers

Oliver Schools, Inc. v. Foley

Finding that "the qualified immunity hurdle . . . is not a valid basis for denying leave to amend the complaint," even though the plaintiff might "ultimately be unable to prevail because of that defense."

Rule 4 - Summons

Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

Section 1964 - Civil remedies

Granting civil remedies for RICO violation

Section 302 - Personal jurisdiction by acts of non-domiciliaries

Holding that service may be made "to a person of suitable age and discretion at the actual place of business, dwelling place or usual place of abode of the person to be served and by ... mailing the summons to the person to be served at his or her last known residence"