§Why CasetextPricing

Lane et al v. Vasquez

MOTION to Sever, MOTION to Dismiss

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan

    536 U.S. 101 (2002)   Cited 10,242 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding limitations period for hostile-work-environment claim runs from the last act composing the claim

  2. Mondy v. Secretary of the Army

    845 F.2d 1051 (D.C. Cir. 1988)   Cited 230 times
    Holding that whether Title VII’s statute of limitations, which the ADA incorporates, should be equitably tolled is a question of federal law

  3. Keeley v. Small

    391 F. Supp. 2d 30 (D.D.C. 2005)   Cited 55 times
    Concluding that plaintiff's claims relating to employer's alleged interference in the EEOC's investigation was not cognizable under Title VII

  4. Aceto v. England

    328 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2004)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that the time limit on a statute of limitations begins when the plaintiff "has a reasonable suspicion that he has been the victim of discrimination"

  5. Blackmon-Malloy v. U.S. Capitol Police Bd.

    338 F. Supp. 2d 97 (D.D.C. 2004)   Cited 16 times

    No. CIV.A. 01-2221(EGS). September 30, 2004. Charles W. Day, Jr., Joseph D. Gebhardt, Gebhardt Associates, LLP, Washington, DC, Richard Lloyd Thompson, II, Nathaniel D. Johnson Associates, Waldorf, MD, for Plaintiffs. Andrea McBarnette, Laurie J. Weinstein, Robin M. Earnest, U.S. Atty's Office, Washington, DC, for Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER SULLIVAN, District Judge. I. Introduction Plaintiffs Sharon Blackmon-Malloy, Dale Veal, Vernier Riggs, Luther Peterson, Duvall Phelps, Larry Ikard, and

  6. Jarmon v. Powell

    208 F. Supp. 2d 21 (D.D.C. 2002)   Cited 14 times
    Examining equitable tolling

  7. Williamson v. Shalala

    992 F. Supp. 454 (D.D.C. 1998)   Cited 9 times

    Civil Action No. 95-1866 SSH. January 30, 1998. Sol Z. Rosen, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Keith V. Morgan, Asst. U.S. Atty., U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Defendant. OPINION STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge. Before the Court are defendant's motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, and plaintiff's opposition thereto. Upon consideration of the entire record, the Court grants defendant's motion to dismiss in part, and grants summary judgment on the remaining

  8. Grant v. Salem

    226 F.R.D. 1 (D.D.C. 2004)   Cited 2 times
    Finding that, because the events underlying plaintiffs' claims "were performed over a period of fifteen months, under varying circumstances," "the facts and circumstances of each plaintiff's claim var[ied] so substantially" that they did not satisfy the transaction or occurrence requirement of Rule 20, despite a single defendant and parallel legal theories

  9. Pleasants v. Allbaugh

    Civil Action No. 00-3094 (JMF) (D.D.C. Nov. 12, 2002)   Cited 2 times

    Civil Action No. 00-3094 (JMF) November 12, 2002 MEMORANDUM OPINION JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge This case has been referred to me by Judge Kessler for all purposes including trial pursuant to LCvR 73.1(a). I herein resolve defendant's Motion for Reconsideration of February 1, 2002, and May 24, 2002 Orders based on the recent analysis of the continuing violation theory issued by the United States Supreme Court in National R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 122 S.Ct. 2061 (2002).

  10. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 344,855 times   920 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

  11. Rule 20 - Permissive Joinder of Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 20   Cited 11,195 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to "issue orders-including an order for separate trials."

  12. Rule 21 - Misjoinder and Nonjoinder of Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 21   Cited 7,391 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Granting district courts broad discretion when deciding whether to sever claims or to dismiss improperly joined claims or defendants

  13. Section 4010 - Separation for cause; suspension

    22 U.S.C. § 4010   Cited 10 times

    (a) Authorization of Secretary; right to hearing; attorneys fees and backpay; leave without pay (1) The Secretary may separate any member from the Service for such cause as will promote the efficiency of the Service, including upon receiving notification from the Bureau of Diplomatic Security that such member has engaged in criminal misconduct, such as murder, rape, or other sexual assault. (2) (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), whenever the Secretary decides under paragraph (1) to separate

  14. Section 1614.105 - Pre-complaint processing

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.105   Cited 2,613 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Requiring complainant initially to notify agency and make effort to resolve matter informally