§Why CasetextPricing

Lambert v. Wolff, et al

MOTION to Substitute Party Keith Bartlett Pursuant to Rule 25

3 Cited authorities

  1. McKenna v. Pacific Rail Service

    32 F.3d 820 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 192 times
    Reversing judgment when an erroneous portion of the jury instructions "more than likely" guided the jury's deliberations

  2. Darmanchev v. Roytshteyn

    234 F.R.D. 78 (E.D. Pa. 2005)   Cited 13 times

    Ely Goldin, Law Offices of Ely Goldin, Jenkintown, PA, for plaintiff. James T. Moughan, Karyn S. Dobroskey, Britt, Hankins & Moughan, Philadelphia, PA, for defendant. MEMORANDUM STENGEL, District Judge. This is a diversity action involving a motor vehicle accident which occurred on December 11, 2002. On December 10, 2004, Mr. Darmanchev, a citizen of the state of Georgia, brought this Complaint against Mr. Roytshteyn, who before his unrelated death, was a resident of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

  3. Rule 25 - Substitution of Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 25   Cited 10,687 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Providing for the automatic substitution at the district-court level of public officers sued in their official capacities